On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:10 AM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ilya, thank you so much for your comments, I'll fix them in next version. > > For TSO support, this patch can work from functionality, but I checked > tpacket_v3 kernel code, I don't think tpacket_v3 kernel part can support it, > my test result also showed very bad performance if userspace-tso-enable is > set to true, for the case you're saying, current tpacket_v3 can't reach very > good performance. > > I have a question, in openstack and vxlan scenario, can userspace-tso-enable > be set to true? Per TSO patch series comments, it can't support such case, > so I'm thinking how we can trade off TSO and tpacket_v3, from my > perspective, tpacket_v3 is the best choice for the cases TSO can't work. I > hope openstack can get good performance when it uses new OVS DPDK version > and don't need to do any change in neutron and ovs agent side. It will be > better if we can work out a good way to cover two used cases. >
Hi Yi, Please see travis test for your v4 patch https://travis-ci.org/williamtu/ovs-travis/builds/652036993 William _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
