From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Upstream commit:
commit 279badc2a85be83e0187b8c566e3b476b76a87a2
Author: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Oct 19 12:55:03 2017 -0500
openvswitch: conntrack: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I placed a "fall through" comment on
its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yi-Hung Wei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <[email protected]>
---
datapath/conntrack.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/datapath/conntrack.c b/datapath/conntrack.c
index b7eb53f..5b4d6cc 100644
--- a/datapath/conntrack.c
+++ b/datapath/conntrack.c
@@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
nf_conn *ct,
}
}
/* Non-ICMP, fall thru to initialize if needed. */
+ /* fall through */
case IP_CT_NEW:
/* Seen it before? This can happen for loopback, retrans,
* or local packets.
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
