OK, done.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:53:40PM -0700, aginwala wrote: > Hi Ben: > Can you also backport this patch to 2.12 and 2.11 too? > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:21 AM Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Damijan Skvarc wrote: > > > problem is reported by valgrind while running functional tests: > > > > > > ==21043== 160 (88 direct, 72 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely > > lost in loss record 7 of 8 > > > ==21043== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in > > /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > > > ==21043== by 0x45EE2E: xmalloc (util.c:138) > > > ==21043== by 0x40CB81: ovsdb_log_open (log.c:270) > > > ==21043== by 0x406B4F: do_db_has_magic.isra.9 (ovsdb-tool.c:563) > > > ==21043== by 0x438670: ovs_cmdl_run_command__ (command-line.c:223) > > > ==21043== by 0x438720: ovs_cmdl_run_command (command-line.c:254) > > > ==21043== by 0x405A4C: main (ovsdb-tool.c:79) > > > > > > problem was in do_db_has_magic() which opens log file which is never > > closed. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Damijan Skvarc <damjan.skv...@gmail.com> > > > > Applied to master, thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > d...@openvswitch.org > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
