On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:21:49AM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > From: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> > > A ByteQ with unlocked head and tail is unsafe for simultaneous > consume/produce.
It isn't meant for that use, or at least it wasn't. If you're changing the goal then you should document the new guarantees, as do the other OVS data structures that have thread-safety guarantees. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
