On 7/7/20 12:55 AM, Han Zhou wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:33 AM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Most ARP/NS responder flows can be configured per datapath instead of per >> router port. >> >> The only exception is with distributed gateway router ports which need >> special treatment. This patch changes the ARP/NS responder behavior > and adds: >> - Priority 92 flows to reply to ARP requests on distributed gateway router >> ports, on the chassis where the DNAT entry is bound. >> - Priority 91 flows to drop ARP requests on distributed gateway router > ports, >> on chassis where the DNAT entry is not bound. >> - Priority 90 flows to reply to ARP requests on all other router > ports. This >> last type of flows is programmed exactly once per logical router > limiting >> the total number of required logical flows. >> >> Suggested-by: Han Zhou <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Reported-at: > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2020-June/050186.html >> Acked-by: Numan Siddique <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > I applied this to master. Thanks!
Thanks! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
