On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:31 PM Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:38 AM Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:02 AM Tony Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The probe awakes recomputing?
> >> There is probe every 5 seconds. Without any connection up/down or
> >> failover,
> >> ovn-northd will recompute everything every 5 seconds, no matter what?
> >> Really?
> >>
> >> Anyways, I will increase the probe interval for now, see if that helps.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should optimise this case. I am planning to look into this.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Numan
> >
>
> Thanks Numan.
> I'd like to discuss more on this before we move forward to change anything.
>
> 1) Regarding the problem itself, the CPU cost triggered by OVSDB IDLE probe
> when there is no configuration change to compute, I don't think it matters
> that much in real production. It simply wastes CPU cycles when there is
> nothing to do, so what harm would it do here? For ovn-northd, since it is
> the centralized component, we would always ensure there is enough CPU
> available for ovn-north when computing is needed, and this reservation will
> be wasted anyway when there is no change to compute. So, I'd avoid making
> any change specifically only to address this issue. I could be wrong,
> though. I'd like to hear what would be the real concern if this is not
> addressed.
>

Agree with you.


>
> 2) ovn-northd incremental processing would avoid this CPU problem
> naturally. So let's discuss how to move forward for incremental processing,
> which is much more important because it also solves the CPU efficiency when
> handling the changes, and the IDLE probe problem is just a byproduct. I
> believe the DDlog branch would have solved this problem. However, it seems
> we are not sure about the current status of DDlog. As you proposed at the
> last OVN meeting, an alternative is to implement partial
> incremental-processing using the I-P engine like ovn-controller. While I
> have no objection to this, we'd better check with Ben and Leonid on the
> plan to avoid overlapping and waste of work. @Ben @Leonid, would you mind
> sharing the status here since you were not at the meeting last week?
>
>
My idea is not to address this issue specifically. But add a very
minimalistic I-P support that
avoids unnecessary recomputation to start with. I don't want to spend too
much time or
make it complicated. But start with a simple one which will trigger full
recompute for any NB DB or SB DB change.


Thanks
Numan




Thanks,
> Han
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Han Zhou <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 8:22 PM
> >> > To: Tony Liu <[email protected]>
> >> > Cc: Han Zhou <[email protected]>; ovs-discuss <
> [email protected]
> >> >;
> >> > ovs-dev <[email protected]>
> >> > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [OVN] ovn-northd takes much CPU when no
> >> > configuration update
> >> >
> >> > Sorry that I didn't make it clear enough. The OVSDB probe itself
> doesn't
> >> > take much CPU, but the probe awakes ovn-northd main loop, which
> >> > recompute everything, which is why you see CPU spike.
> >> > It will be solved by incremental-processing, when only delta is
> >> > processed, and in case of probe handling, there is no change in
> >> > configuration, so the delta is zero.
> >> > For now, please follow the steps to adjust probe interval, if the CPU
> of
> >> > ovn-northd (when there is no configuration change) is a concern for
> you.
> >> > But please remember that this has no impact to the real CPU usage for
> >> > handling configuration changes.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Han
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:11 PM Tony Liu <[email protected]
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >       Health check (5 sec internal) taking 30%-100% CPU is definitely
> >> not
> >> > acceptable,
> >> >       if that's really the case. There must be some blocking (and not
> >> > yielding CPU)
> >> >       in coding, which is not supposed to be there.
> >> >
> >> >       Could you point me to the coding for such health check?
> >> >       Is it single thread? Does it use any event library?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >       Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >       Tony
> >> >
> >> >       > -----Original Message-----
> >> >       > From: Han Zhou <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
> >> >       > Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 9:11 PM
> >> >       > To: Tony Liu <[email protected]
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]> >
> >> >       > Cc: ovs-discuss <[email protected] <mailto:ovs-
> >> > [email protected]> >; ovs-dev <ovs-
> >> >       > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
> >> >       > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [OVN] ovn-northd takes much CPU
> when
> >> > no
> >> >       > configuration update
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 4:14 PM Tony Liu <
> >> [email protected]
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> >       > <mailto:[email protected]
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > > wrote:
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       Hi,
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       I see the active ovn-northd takes much CPU (30% - 100%)
> >> > when there
> >> >       > is no
> >> >       >       configuration from OpenStack, nothing happening on all
> >> > chassis
> >> >       > nodes either.
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       Is this expected? What is it busy with?
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       > Yes, this is expected. It is due to the OVSDB probe between
> ovn-
> >> > northd
> >> >       > and NB/SB OVSDB servers, which is used to detect the OVSDB
> >> > connection
> >> >       > failure.
> >> >       > Usually this is not a concern (unlike the probe with a large
> >> > number of
> >> >       > ovn-controller clients), because ovn-northd is a centralized
> >> > component
> >> >       > and the CPU cost when there is no configuration change doesn't
> >> > matter
> >> >       > that much. However, if it is a concern, the probe interval
> >> > (default 5
> >> >       > sec) can be changed.
> >> >       > If you change, remember to change on both server side and
> client
> >> > side.
> >> >       > For client side (ovn-northd), it is configured in the NB DB's
> >> > NB_Global
> >> >       > table's options:northd_probe_interval. See man page of
> >> ovn-nb(5).
> >> >       > For server side (NB and SB), it is configured in the NB and SB
> >> > DB's
> >> >       > Connection table's inactivity_probe column.
> >> >       >
> >> >       > Thanks,
> >> >       > Han
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       ========
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:09.511Z|04267|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 8 (10.6.20.84:44358 <http://10.6.20.84:44358>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:44358> <->10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (68% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:09.512Z|04268|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:09.512Z|04269|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:12.777Z|04270|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 9 (10.6.20.84:49158 <http://10.6.20.84:49158>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:49158> <->10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (34% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04271|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : idle 5002 ms, sending inactivity
> >> probe
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04272|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering IDLE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04273|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send request, method="echo",
> >> params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04274|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04275|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering ACTIVE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:12.777Z|04276|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:13.635Z|04277|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 9 (10.6.20.84:49158 <http://10.6.20.84:49158>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:49158> <->10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (34% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:13.635Z|04278|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received reply, result=[],
> id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:14.480Z|04279|hmap|DBG|Dropped 129 log
> >> > messages in
> >> >       > last 5 seconds (most recently, 0 seconds ago) due to excessive
> >> > rate
> >> >       >
>  2020-07-31T23:08:14.480Z|04280|hmap|DBG|lib/shash.c:112: 2
> >> > buckets
> >> >       > with 6+ nodes, including 2 buckets with 6 nodes (32 nodes
> total
> >> > across
> >> >       > 32 buckets)
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:14.513Z|04281|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > 27-ms
> >> >       > timeout at lib/reconnect.c:643 (34% CPU usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:14.513Z|04282|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : idle 5001 ms, sending inactivity
> >> probe
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:14.513Z|04283|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : entering IDLE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:14.513Z|04284|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send request, method="echo",
> >> params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:15.370Z|04285|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 8 (10.6.20.84:44358 <http://10.6.20.84:44358>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:44358> <->10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (34% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:15.370Z|04286|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:15.370Z|04287|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : entering ACTIVE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:15.370Z|04288|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:16.236Z|04289|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > 0-ms
> >> >       > timeout at tcp:10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>  (100% CPU usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:16.236Z|04290|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received reply, result=[],
> id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:17.778Z|04291|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 9 (10.6.20.84:49158 <http://10.6.20.84:49158>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:49158> <->10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (100% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:17.778Z|04292|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:17.778Z|04293|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:20.372Z|04294|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 8 (10.6.20.84:44358 <http://10.6.20.84:44358>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:44358> <->10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (41% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04295|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : idle 5002 ms, sending inactivity
> >> probe
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04296|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : entering IDLE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04297|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send request, method="echo",
> >> params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04298|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04299|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : entering ACTIVE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:20.372Z|04300|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:20.376Z|04301|hmap|DBG|Dropped 181 log
> >> > messages in
> >> >       > last 6 seconds (most recently, 1 seconds ago) due to excessive
> >> > rate
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:20.376Z|04302|hmap|DBG|northd/ovn-
> >> > northd.c:595: 2
> >> >       > buckets with 6+ nodes, including 2 buckets with 6 nodes (256
> >> > nodes total
> >> >       > across 256 buckets)
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:21.222Z|04303|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 8 (10.6.20.84:44358 <http://10.6.20.84:44358>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:44358> <->10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (41% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:21.223Z|04304|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received reply, result=[],
> id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:22.779Z|04305|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > 706-ms
> >> >       > timeout at lib/reconnect.c:643 (41% CPU usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:22.779Z|04306|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : idle 5001 ms, sending inactivity
> >> probe
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:22.779Z|04307|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering IDLE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:22.779Z|04308|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send request, method="echo",
> >> params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:23.632Z|04309|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 9 (10.6.20.84:49158 <http://10.6.20.84:49158>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:49158> <->10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (79% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:23.632Z|04310|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:23.632Z|04311|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering ACTIVE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:23.632Z|04312|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:24.481Z|04313|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > 0-ms
> >> >       > timeout at tcp:10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>  (79% CPU usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:24.481Z|04314|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received reply, result=[],
> id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:25.372Z|04315|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 8 (10.6.20.84:44358 <http://10.6.20.84:44358>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:44358> <->10.6.20.84:6641 <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (79% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:25.372Z|04316|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:25.372Z|04317|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.84:6641
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:6641>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.84:6641> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:28.634Z|04318|poll_loop|DBG|wakeup due
> to
> >> > [POLLIN]
> >> >       > on fd 9 (10.6.20.84:49158 <http://10.6.20.84:49158>
> >> > <http://10.6.20.84:49158> <->10.6.20.85:6642 <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> ) at lib/stream-fd.c:157 (50% CPU
> >> usage)
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04319|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : idle 5002 ms, sending inactivity
> >> probe
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04320|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering IDLE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04321|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send request, method="echo",
> >> params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04322|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : received request, method="echo",
> >> > params=[],
> >> >       > id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04323|reconnect|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : entering ACTIVE
> >> >       >       2020-07-
> >> > 31T23:08:28.634Z|04324|jsonrpc|DBG|tcp:10.6.20.85:6642
> >> > <http://10.6.20.85:6642>
> >> >       > <http://10.6.20.85:6642> : send reply, result=[], id="echo"
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:28.638Z|04325|hmap|DBG|Dropped 266 log
> >> > messages in
> >> >       > last 9 seconds (most recently, 3 seconds ago) due to excessive
> >> > rate
> >> >       >       2020-07-31T23:08:28.638Z|04326|hmap|DBG|northd/ovn-
> >> > northd.c:595: 2
> >> >       > buckets with 6+ nodes, including 2 buckets with 6 nodes (256
> >> > nodes total
> >> >       > across 256 buckets)
> >> >       >       ========
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       Thanks!
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       Tony
> >> >       >
> >> >       >       _______________________________________________
> >> >       >       discuss mailing list
> >> >       >       [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> >
> >> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
> >> >       >
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> >> >       >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to