On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:24:10PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote: > 2.5 release is 4.5 years old and I'm not aware of anyone who actually > uses it today. Release process documentation says that there is no > strict time period for nominating a new LTS release and that usually > it happens once in a two years. So, proposing to nominate 2.13 as > our new LTS release since it's a first release that doesn't include > OVN inside, so we will formally not have to support it in this > repository in case there are major issues that might be hard to fix. > > Suggested-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
I have no objections to this but, OTOH, I don't really feel that I'm in a position to sign off on it. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > index 9d5d2c3e1..1e6d3ab9e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > +++ b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Q: What does it mean for an Open vSwitch release to be LTS > (long-term support)? > If a significant bug is identified in an LTS release, we will provide an > updated release that includes the fix. Releases that are not LTS may not > be fixed and may just be supplanted by the next major release. The > current > - LTS release is 2.5.x. > + LTS release is 2.13.x. > > For more information on the Open vSwitch release process, refer to > :doc:`/internals/release-process`. > -- > 2.25.4 > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
