On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:43:38PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 9/9/20 7:08 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
> > From: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
> >
> > Currently, the channel handlers are polled globally. On some
> > systems, this causes a thundering herd issue where multiple
> > handler threads become active, only to do no work and immediately
> > sleep.
> >
> > The approach here is to push the netlink socket channels to discreet
> > handler threads to process, rather than polling on every thread.
> > This will eliminate the need to wake multiple threads.
> >
> > To check:
> >
> > ip netns add left
> > ip netns add right
> > ip link add center-left type veth peer name left0 netns left
> > ip link add center-right type veth peer name right0 netns right
> > ip link set center-left up
> > ip link set center-right up
> > ip -n left ip link set left0 up
> > ip -n left ip addr add 172.31.110.10/24 dev left0
> > ip -n right ip link set right0 up
> > ip -n right ip addr add 172.31.110.11/24 dev right0
> >
> > ovs-vsctl add-br br0
> > ovs-vsctl add-port br0 center-right
> > ovs-vsctl add-port br0 center-left
> >
> > # in one terminal
> > perf record -e sched:sched_wakeup,irq:softirq_entry -ag
> >
> > # in a separate terminal
> > ip netns exec left arping -I left0 -c 1 172.31.110.11
> >
> > # in the perf terminal after exiting
> > perf script
> >
> > Look for the number of 'handler' threads which were made active.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
> > Co-authored-by: Mark Gray <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: David Ahern <[email protected]>
> > Reported-at:
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2019-December/365857.html
> > Cc: Matteo Croce <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Flavio Leitner <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 69c51582f ("dpif-netlink: don't allocate per thread netlink sockets")
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Gray <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> >
> > v2: Oops - forgot to commit my whitespace cleanups.
> > v3: one port latency results as per Matteo's comments
> >
> > Stock:
> > min/avg/max/mdev = 21.5/36.5/96.5/1.0 us
> > With Patch:
> > min/avg/max/mdev = 5.3/9.7/98.4/0.5 us
> > v4: Oops - first email did not send
> > v5: min/avg/max/mdev = 9.3/10.4/33.6/2.2 us
> > v6: Split out the AUTHORS patch and added a cover letter as
> > per Ilya's suggestion.
> > Fixed 0-day issues.
> > v7: Merged patches as per Flavio's suggestion. This is
> > no longer a series. Fixed some other small issues.
> >
> > lib/dpif-netlink.c | 330 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > lib/id-pool.c | 10 ++
> > lib/id-pool.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/dpif-netlink.c b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> > index 7da4fb54d..a74838506 100644
> > --- a/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> > +++ b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > #include "dpif-provider.h"
> > #include "fat-rwlock.h"
> > #include "flow.h"
> > +#include "id-pool.h"
> > #include "netdev-linux.h"
> > #include "netdev-offload.h"
> > #include "netdev-provider.h"
> > @@ -160,6 +161,9 @@ static void dpif_netlink_flow_to_dpif_flow(struct
> > dpif_flow *,
> >
> > /* One of the dpif channels between the kernel and userspace. */
> > struct dpif_channel {
> > + struct hmap_node hmap_node;
>
> This needs a comment and all other new structure fileds too.
> Ex.:
> struct hmap_node hmap_node; /* In struct dpif_handler's channels hmap. */
>
> > + struct dpif_handler *handler;
>
> Why do we need this back-pointer? Maybe it's better to just add 'handler'
> argument to dpif_channel_del() ?
>
> > + uint32_t port_idx;
>
> I see a lot of 'port_idx' here and there, but it's not really an index
> anymore.
> You removed all the arrays that used these variables as index.
> Can we just use 'port_no' directly here? I know that there will be
> conversions
> from odp to u32, but this should be more clear. If conversions are the issue,
> we could store u32 version of 'port_no' here.
>
> And, please, add a comment.
>
> > struct nl_sock *sock; /* Netlink socket. */
> > long long int last_poll; /* Last time this channel was polled. */
> > };
> > @@ -183,6 +187,8 @@ struct dpif_handler {
> > int n_events; /* Num events returned by epoll_wait().
> > */
> > int event_offset; /* Offset into 'epoll_events'. */
> >
> > + struct hmap channels; /* map of channels for each port. */
>
> Comment style: Capital letter.
>
> > +
> > #ifdef _WIN32
> > /* Pool of sockets. */
> > struct dpif_windows_vport_sock *vport_sock_pool;
> > @@ -201,9 +207,8 @@ struct dpif_netlink {
> > struct fat_rwlock upcall_lock;
> > struct dpif_handler *handlers;
> > uint32_t n_handlers; /* Num of upcall handlers. */
> > - struct dpif_channel *channels; /* Array of channels for each port. */
> > - int uc_array_size; /* Size of 'handler->channels' and */
> > - /* 'handler->epoll_events'. */
> > +
> > + struct id_pool *port_ids; /* Set of added port ids */
>
> What is the reason of having this pool? Datapath port numbers are unique
> except for ODPP_NONE, and all the functions you implemented actually
> iterates over all channels anyway to find one with requested port_idx.
> So, the only purpose of it is to avoid searching on incorect port number,
> but this should be a rare case. Can we just remove it?
>
> OTOH, if it's necessary to have this id pool, I'd suggest to use hmapx
> instead as it already has all required infrastructure and doesn't actually
> care about range of values.
Well, now it iterates over handlers looking for a channel that has
a port, so maybe it's better to have ports hashed so we can get the
channel?
fbl
>
> >
> > /* Change notification. */
> > struct nl_sock *port_notifier; /* vport multicast group subscriber. */
> > @@ -287,6 +292,44 @@ close_nl_sock(struct nl_sock *sock)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +static size_t
> > +dpif_handler_channels_count(const struct dpif_handler *handler)
> > +{
> > + return hmap_count(&handler->channels);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct dpif_channel *
> > +dpif_handler_channel_find(struct dpif_handler *handler, uint32_t idx)
> > +{
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel;
> > +
> > + HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH (channel, hmap_node, hash_int(idx, 0),
> > + &handler->channels) {
> > + if (channel->port_idx == idx) {
> > + return channel;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +dpif_channel_del(struct dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel)
>
> As suggested above, it might make sense to just pass 'handler' here and
> avoid having back-pointer inside the channel structure.
>
> > +{
> > + struct dpif_handler *handler = channel->handler;
> > +
> > +#ifndef _WIN32
> > + epoll_ctl(handler->epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL,
> > + nl_sock_fd(channel->sock), NULL);
> > + nl_sock_destroy(channel->sock);
> > +#endif
> > + hmap_remove(&handler->channels, &channel->hmap_node);
> > + id_pool_free_id(dpif->port_ids, channel->port_idx);
> > + handler->event_offset = handler->n_events = 0;
> > + free(channel);
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct dpif_netlink *
> > dpif_netlink_cast(const struct dpif *dpif)
> > {
> > @@ -385,6 +428,7 @@ open_dpif(const struct dpif_netlink_dp *dp, struct dpif
> > **dpifp)
> >
> > dpif->dp_ifindex = dp->dp_ifindex;
> > dpif->user_features = dp->user_features;
> > + dpif->port_ids = id_pool_create(0, MAX_PORTS);
> > *dpifp = &dpif->dpif;
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -446,167 +490,151 @@ error:
> > }
> > #endif /* _WIN32 */
> >
> > -/* Given the port number 'port_idx', extracts the pid of netlink socket
> > +/* Given the port number 'port_no', extracts the pid of netlink socket
> > * associated to the port and assigns it to 'upcall_pid'. */
> > static bool
> > -vport_get_pid(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, uint32_t port_idx,
> > +vport_get_pid(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, odp_port_t port_no,
> > uint32_t *upcall_pid)
>
> This function seems redundant as it does almost same thing as
> dpif_netlink_port_get_pid__(). Can we combine them?
>
> > {
> > - /* Since the nl_sock can only be assigned in either all
> > - * or none "dpif" channels, the following check
> > - * would suffice. */
> > - if (!dpif->channels[port_idx].sock) {
> > + uint32_t port_idx = odp_to_u32(port_no);
> > + size_t i;
> > +
> > + ovs_assert(!WINDOWS || dpif->n_handlers <= 1);
> > +
> > + if (!id_pool_has_id(dpif->port_ids, port_idx)) {
> > return false;
> > }
> > - ovs_assert(!WINDOWS || dpif->n_handlers <= 1);
> >
> > - *upcall_pid = nl_sock_pid(dpif->channels[port_idx].sock);
> > + /* The 'port_idx' should only be valid for a single handler. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel;
> > +
> > + channel = dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i], port_idx);
> > + if (channel) {
> > + *upcall_pid = nl_sock_pid(channel->sock);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > - return true;
> > + return false;
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > vport_add_channel(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, odp_port_t port_no,
> > struct nl_sock *sock)
> > {
> > - struct epoll_event event;
> > uint32_t port_idx = odp_to_u32(port_no);
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel;
> > + struct dpif_handler *handler;
> > + struct epoll_event event;
> > size_t i;
> > - int error;
> >
> > - if (dpif->handlers == NULL) {
> > + if (dpif->handlers == NULL ||
> > + id_pool_has_id(dpif->port_ids, port_idx)) {
> > close_nl_sock(sock);
> > - return 0;
> > + return EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - /* We assume that the datapath densely chooses port numbers, which can
> > - * therefore be used as an index into 'channels' and 'epoll_events' of
> > - * 'dpif'. */
> > - if (port_idx >= dpif->uc_array_size) {
> > - uint32_t new_size = port_idx + 1;
> > -
> > - if (new_size > MAX_PORTS) {
> > - VLOG_WARN_RL(&error_rl, "%s: datapath port %"PRIu32" too big",
> > - dpif_name(&dpif->dpif), port_no);
> > - return EFBIG;
> > - }
> > + if (port_idx >= MAX_PORTS) {
> > + VLOG_WARN_RL(&error_rl, "%s: datapath port %"PRIu32" too big",
> > + dpif_name(&dpif->dpif), port_no);
>
> This looks a bit wierd since we're checking port_idx and printing port_no
> instead. Might be refined if we will just use port_no everywhere.
>
> > + return EFBIG;
> > + }
> >
> > - dpif->channels = xrealloc(dpif->channels,
> > - new_size * sizeof *dpif->channels);
> > + handler = &dpif->handlers[0];
> >
> > - for (i = dpif->uc_array_size; i < new_size; i++) {
> > - dpif->channels[i].sock = NULL;
> > + for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > + if (dpif_handler_channels_count(&dpif->handlers[i]) <
> > + dpif_handler_channels_count(handler)) {
> > + handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > }
> > + }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > - struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > + channel = xmalloc(sizeof *channel);
> > + channel->port_idx = port_idx;
> > + channel->sock = sock;
> > + channel->last_poll = LLONG_MIN;
> > + channel->handler = handler;
> > + hmap_insert(&handler->channels, &channel->hmap_node,
> > + hash_int(port_idx, 0));
> >
> > - handler->epoll_events = xrealloc(handler->epoll_events,
> > - new_size * sizeof *handler->epoll_events);
> > -
> > - }
> > - dpif->uc_array_size = new_size;
> > - }
> > + handler->epoll_events = xrealloc(handler->epoll_events,
> > + dpif_handler_channels_count(handler) *
> > + sizeof *handler->epoll_events);
> >
> > memset(&event, 0, sizeof event);
> > event.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLEXCLUSIVE;
> > event.data.u32 = port_idx;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > - struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > -
> > #ifndef _WIN32
> > - if (epoll_ctl(handler->epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nl_sock_fd(sock),
> > - &event) < 0) {
> > - error = errno;
> > - goto error;
> > - }
> > -#endif
> > - }
> > - dpif->channels[port_idx].sock = sock;
> > - dpif->channels[port_idx].last_poll = LLONG_MIN;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > -error:
> > -#ifndef _WIN32
> > - while (i--) {
> > - epoll_ctl(dpif->handlers[i].epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL,
> > - nl_sock_fd(sock), NULL);
> > + if (epoll_ctl(handler->epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nl_sock_fd(sock),
> > + &event) < 0) {
> > + hmap_remove(&handler->channels, &channel->hmap_node);
> > + free(channel);
> > + id_pool_free_id(dpif->port_ids, port_idx);
> > + return errno;
> > }
> > #endif
> > - dpif->channels[port_idx].sock = NULL;
> >
> > - return error;
> > + id_pool_add(dpif->port_ids, port_idx);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void
> > -vport_del_channels(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, odp_port_t port_no)
> > +static bool
> > +vport_del_channel(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, odp_port_t port_no)
> > {
> > - uint32_t port_idx = odp_to_u32(port_no);
> > size_t i;
> >
> > - if (!dpif->handlers || port_idx >= dpif->uc_array_size
> > - || !dpif->channels[port_idx].sock) {
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > - struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > -#ifndef _WIN32
> > - epoll_ctl(handler->epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL,
> > - nl_sock_fd(dpif->channels[port_idx].sock), NULL);
> > -#endif
> > - handler->event_offset = handler->n_events = 0;
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel;
> > +
> > + channel = dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i],
> > + odp_to_u32(port_no));
> > + if (channel) {
> > + dpif_channel_del(dpif, channel);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > }
> > -#ifndef _WIN32
> > - nl_sock_destroy(dpif->channels[port_idx].sock);
> > -#endif
> > - dpif->channels[port_idx].sock = NULL;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > destroy_all_channels(struct dpif_netlink *dpif)
> > OVS_REQ_WRLOCK(dpif->upcall_lock)
> > {
> > - unsigned int i;
> > + size_t i;
> >
> > if (!dpif->handlers) {
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < dpif->uc_array_size; i++ ) {
> > - struct dpif_netlink_vport vport_request;
> > - uint32_t upcall_pids = 0;
> > -
> > - if (!dpif->channels[i].sock) {
> > - continue;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Turn off upcalls. */
> > - dpif_netlink_vport_init(&vport_request);
> > - vport_request.cmd = OVS_VPORT_CMD_SET;
> > - vport_request.dp_ifindex = dpif->dp_ifindex;
> > - vport_request.port_no = u32_to_odp(i);
> > - vport_request.n_upcall_pids = 1;
> > - vport_request.upcall_pids = &upcall_pids;
> > - dpif_netlink_vport_transact(&vport_request, NULL, NULL);
> > -
> > - vport_del_channels(dpif, u32_to_odp(i));
> > - }
> > -
> > for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel, *next;
> > +
> > + HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (channel, next, hmap_node, &handler->channels) {
> > + struct dpif_netlink_vport vport_request;
> > + uint32_t upcall_pids = 0;
>
> Empty line, please.
>
> > + /* Turn off upcalls. */
> > + dpif_netlink_vport_init(&vport_request);
> > + vport_request.cmd = OVS_VPORT_CMD_SET;
> > + vport_request.dp_ifindex = dpif->dp_ifindex;
> > + vport_request.port_no = u32_to_odp(channel->port_idx);
> > + vport_request.n_upcall_pids = 1;
> > + vport_request.upcall_pids = &upcall_pids;
> > + dpif_netlink_vport_transact(&vport_request, NULL, NULL);
> > + ovs_assert(channel != NULL);
> > + dpif_channel_del(dpif, channel);
> > + }
> >
> > dpif_netlink_handler_uninit(handler);
> > free(handler->epoll_events);
> > }
> > - free(dpif->channels);
> > +
> > free(dpif->handlers);
> > dpif->handlers = NULL;
> > - dpif->channels = NULL;
> > dpif->n_handlers = 0;
> > - dpif->uc_array_size = 0;
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > @@ -618,9 +646,11 @@ dpif_netlink_close(struct dpif *dpif_)
> >
> > fat_rwlock_wrlock(&dpif->upcall_lock);
> > destroy_all_channels(dpif);
> > + id_pool_destroy(dpif->port_ids);
> > fat_rwlock_unlock(&dpif->upcall_lock);
> >
> > fat_rwlock_destroy(&dpif->upcall_lock);
> > +
> > free(dpif);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1003,7 +1033,9 @@ dpif_netlink_port_del__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > odp_port_t port_no)
> > #endif
> > error = dpif_netlink_vport_transact(&vport, NULL, NULL);
> >
> > - vport_del_channels(dpif, port_no);
> > + if (!vport_del_channel(dpif, port_no)) {
>
> If packets receiving disabled with dpif_recv_set(), there will be no channels
> and this check will fail. And if it we will return here we will leave tunnel
> port in a system which is not a good thing.
>
> And we will also leak 'dpif_port' here.
>
> > + return EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > if (!error && !ovs_tunnels_out_of_tree) {
> > error = dpif_netlink_rtnl_port_destroy(dpif_port.name,
> > dpif_port.type);
> > @@ -1084,23 +1116,39 @@ dpif_netlink_port_get_pid__(const struct
> > dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > odp_port_t port_no)
> > OVS_REQ_RDLOCK(dpif->upcall_lock)
> > {
> > + struct dpif_channel *min_channel = NULL, *found_channel = NULL;
> > uint32_t port_idx = odp_to_u32(port_no);
> > uint32_t pid = 0;
> > + size_t i;
> > +
> > + /* The ODPP_NONE "reserved" port number uses the "ovs-system"'s
> > + * channel, since it is not heavily loaded. */
> > + uint32_t idx = port_no == ODPP_NONE ? 0 : port_idx;
> > +
> > + if (!id_pool_has_id(dpif->port_ids, port_idx)) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (dpif->handlers) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > + if (dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i], idx)) {
> > + found_channel =
> > dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i],
> > + idx);
>
> Looking up twice seems inefficient. Same for the 0 case below.
>
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (dpif->handlers && dpif->uc_array_size > 0) {
> > - /* The ODPP_NONE "reserved" port number uses the "ovs-system"'s
> > - * channel, since it is not heavily loaded. */
> > - uint32_t idx = port_idx >= dpif->uc_array_size ? 0 : port_idx;
> > -
> > - /* Needs to check in case the socket pointer is changed in between
> > - * the holding of upcall_lock. A known case happens when the main
> > - * thread deletes the vport while the handler thread is handling
> > - * the upcall from that port. */
> > - if (dpif->channels[idx].sock) {
> > - pid = nl_sock_pid(dpif->channels[idx].sock);
> > + if (dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i], 0)) {
> > + min_channel =
> > dpif_handler_channel_find(&dpif->handlers[i], 0);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (found_channel) {
> > + pid = nl_sock_pid(found_channel->sock);
> > + } else if (min_channel) {
> > + pid = nl_sock_pid(min_channel->sock);
>
> This might be a question for Aaron mostly.
>
> Could you, please, elaborate why we have a behavior change here?
> Old code just returnd 0 as a pid, but after this change we will return
> pid of a channel of port 0.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > return pid;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2342,12 +2390,14 @@ dpif_netlink_operate(struct dpif *dpif_, struct
> > dpif_op **ops, size_t n_ops,
> > static void
> > dpif_netlink_handler_uninit(struct dpif_handler *handler)
> > {
> > + hmap_destroy(&handler->channels);
> > vport_delete_sock_pool(handler);
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > dpif_netlink_handler_init(struct dpif_handler *handler)
> > {
> > + hmap_init(&handler->channels);
> > return vport_create_sock_pool(handler);
> > }
> > #else
> > @@ -2355,6 +2405,7 @@ dpif_netlink_handler_init(struct dpif_handler
> > *handler)
> > static int
> > dpif_netlink_handler_init(struct dpif_handler *handler)
> > {
> > + hmap_init(&handler->channels);
> > handler->epoll_fd = epoll_create(10);
> > return handler->epoll_fd < 0 ? errno : 0;
> > }
> > @@ -2362,6 +2413,7 @@ dpif_netlink_handler_init(struct dpif_handler
> > *handler)
> > static void
> > dpif_netlink_handler_uninit(struct dpif_handler *handler)
> > {
> > + hmap_destroy(&handler->channels);
> > close(handler->epoll_fd);
> > }
> > #endif
> > @@ -2374,9 +2426,7 @@ static int
> > dpif_netlink_refresh_channels(struct dpif_netlink *dpif, uint32_t
> > n_handlers)
> > OVS_REQ_WRLOCK(dpif->upcall_lock)
> > {
> > - unsigned long int *keep_channels;
> > struct dpif_netlink_vport vport;
> > - size_t keep_channels_nbits;
> > struct nl_dump dump;
> > uint64_t reply_stub[NL_DUMP_BUFSIZE / 8];
> > struct ofpbuf buf;
> > @@ -2412,22 +2462,16 @@ dpif_netlink_refresh_channels(struct dpif_netlink
> > *dpif, uint32_t n_handlers)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < n_handlers; i++) {
> > struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > -
>
> Please, keep.
>
> > handler->event_offset = handler->n_events = 0;
> > }
> >
> > - keep_channels_nbits = dpif->uc_array_size;
> > - keep_channels = bitmap_allocate(keep_channels_nbits);
> > -
> > ofpbuf_use_stub(&buf, reply_stub, sizeof reply_stub);
> > dpif_netlink_port_dump_start__(dpif, &dump);
> > while (!dpif_netlink_port_dump_next__(dpif, &dump, &vport, &buf)) {
> > - uint32_t port_no = odp_to_u32(vport.port_no);
> > uint32_t upcall_pid;
> > int error;
> >
> > - if (port_no >= dpif->uc_array_size
> > - || !vport_get_pid(dpif, port_no, &upcall_pid)) {
> > + if (!vport_get_pid(dpif, vport.port_no, &upcall_pid)) {
> > struct nl_sock *sock;
> > error = create_nl_sock(dpif, &sock);
> >
> > @@ -2475,25 +2519,15 @@ dpif_netlink_refresh_channels(struct dpif_netlink
> > *dpif, uint32_t n_handlers)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (port_no < keep_channels_nbits) {
> > - bitmap_set1(keep_channels, port_no);
> > - }
> > continue;
> >
> > error:
> > - vport_del_channels(dpif, vport.port_no);
> > + vport_del_channel(dpif, vport.port_no);
> > }
> > +
> > nl_dump_done(&dump);
> > ofpbuf_uninit(&buf);
> >
> > - /* Discard any saved channels that we didn't reuse. */
> > - for (i = 0; i < keep_channels_nbits; i++) {
> > - if (!bitmap_is_set(keep_channels, i)) {
> > - vport_del_channels(dpif, u32_to_odp(i));
> > - }
> > - }
> > - free(keep_channels);
> > -
> > return retval;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2714,6 +2748,8 @@ dpif_netlink_recv__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > uint32_t handler_id,
> > OVS_REQ_RDLOCK(dpif->upcall_lock)
> > {
> > struct dpif_handler *handler;
> > + size_t n_channels;
> > +
> > int read_tries = 0;
> >
> > if (!dpif->handlers || handler_id >= dpif->n_handlers) {
> > @@ -2721,14 +2757,15 @@ dpif_netlink_recv__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > uint32_t handler_id,
> > }
> >
> > handler = &dpif->handlers[handler_id];
> > - if (handler->event_offset >= handler->n_events) {
> > + n_channels = dpif_handler_channels_count(handler);
> > + if (handler->event_offset >= handler->n_events && n_channels) {
> > int retval;
> >
> > handler->event_offset = handler->n_events = 0;
> >
> > do {
> > retval = epoll_wait(handler->epoll_fd, handler->epoll_events,
> > - dpif->uc_array_size, 0);
> > + n_channels, 0);
> > } while (retval < 0 && errno == EINTR);
> >
> > if (retval < 0) {
> > @@ -2741,7 +2778,10 @@ dpif_netlink_recv__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif,
> > uint32_t handler_id,
> >
> > while (handler->event_offset < handler->n_events) {
> > int idx = handler->epoll_events[handler->event_offset].data.u32;
> > - struct dpif_channel *ch = &dpif->channels[idx];
> > + struct dpif_channel *ch = dpif_handler_channel_find(handler, idx);
> > + if (!ch) {
> > + return EAGAIN;
>
> How can it be that handler received event on port that it doesn't have
> channel for?
> Maybe assertion will be better here?
>
> > + }
> >
> > handler->event_offset++;
> >
> > @@ -2845,12 +2885,14 @@ dpif_netlink_recv_purge__(struct dpif_netlink *dpif)
> > if (dpif->handlers) {
> > size_t i;
> >
> > - if (!dpif->channels[0].sock) {
> > - return;
> > - }
> > - for (i = 0; i < dpif->uc_array_size; i++ ) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < dpif->n_handlers; i++) {
> > + struct dpif_handler *handler = &dpif->handlers[i];
> > + struct dpif_channel *channel;
> > +
> > + HMAP_FOR_EACH (channel, hmap_node, &handler->channels) {
> > + nl_sock_drain(channel->sock);
> > + }
> >
> > - nl_sock_drain(dpif->channels[i].sock);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/lib/id-pool.c b/lib/id-pool.c
> > index 69910ad08..bef822f6b 100644
> > --- a/lib/id-pool.c
> > +++ b/lib/id-pool.c
> > @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ id_pool_find(struct id_pool *pool, uint32_t id)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +bool
> > +id_pool_has_id(struct id_pool *pool, uint32_t id)
> > +{
> > + if (!id_pool_find(pool, id)) {
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > void
> > id_pool_add(struct id_pool *pool, uint32_t id)
> > {
> > diff --git a/lib/id-pool.h b/lib/id-pool.h
> > index 8721f8793..62876e2a5 100644
> > --- a/lib/id-pool.h
> > +++ b/lib/id-pool.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ void id_pool_destroy(struct id_pool *);
> > bool id_pool_alloc_id(struct id_pool *, uint32_t *id);
> > void id_pool_free_id(struct id_pool *, uint32_t id);
> > void id_pool_add(struct id_pool *, uint32_t id);
> > +bool id_pool_has_id(struct id_pool *, uint32_t id);
> >
> > /*
> > * ID pool.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
--
fbl
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
