On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:24 AM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/20 12:41 AM, Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> > On userspace datapath, geneve option flag FLOW_TNL_F_UDPIF should only
> > be set when the geneve option is available.  However, currently, we always
> > set FLOW_TNL_F_UDPIF in the metadata flag, and that may result in megaflow
> > revalidation issue when the geneve option length is zero due to the datapath
> > flow key mis-match.  That is the original flow key always has 
> > FLOW_TNL_F_UDPIF
> > set, while the regenerated flow key during revalidation process  only has
> > FLOW_TNL_F_UDPIF set if geneve option length is zero.  For reference, check
> > tun_metadata_to_geneve_nlattr() to see how the flow key of geneve
> > tunnel metadatafor are generated from netlink attributes.
> >
> > The following are the reproducible steps reported by Antonin.
> > After step 6, OvS reports a warning about failing to update the datapath
> > flow.
> >
> > 2020-12-15T01:56:21.324Z|00007|dpif(revalidator4)|WARN|netdev@ovs-netdev:
> > failed to put[modify] (No such file or directory)
> > ufid:d252fe62-5b2a-44e6-846a-190328190e09 skb_priority(0/0),
> > tunnel(tun_id=0x0,src=192.168.77.1,dst=192.168.77.2,ttl=64/0,tp_src=57391/0,
> > tp_dst=6081/0,flags(-df-csum+key)),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0x21/0x21),
> > ct_zone(0xfff0/0),ct_mark(0/0),ct_label(0/0),ct_tuple4(src=10.10.0.1/0.0.0.0,
> > dst=10.10.0.2/0.0.0.0,proto=1/0,tp_src=8/0,tp_dst=0/0),recirc_id(0xa),
> > dp_hash(0/0),in_port(5),packet_type(ns=0,id=0),
> > eth(src=1e:9c:f0:fb:18:9c/00:00:00:00:00:00,dst=ee:9f:60:8a:c0:a5/00:00:00:00:00:00),
> > eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.10.0.1/0.0.0.0,dst=10.10.0.2,proto=1/0,tos=0/0,
> > ttl=64/0,frag=no),icmp(type=8/0,code=0/0), actions:drop
> >
> > Setup:
> > 2 Nodes on the same subnet (192.168.77.101/24 - 192.168.77.102/24)
> >
> > Step 1 – Creating bridges (run on each Node):
> >
> > iface="enp0s8"
> >
> > hwaddr=$(ip link show $iface | grep link/ether | awk '{print $2}')
> > inet=$(ip addr show $iface | grep "inet " | awk '{ print $2 }')
> >
> > ovs-vsctl add-br br-phy \
> >           -- set Bridge br-phy datapath_type=netdev \
> >           -- br-set-external-id br-phy bridge-id br-phy \
> >           -- set bridge br-phy fail-mode=standalone \
> >           other_config:hwaddr="$hwaddr"
> > ovs-vsctl --timeout 10 add-port br-phy "$iface"
> > ip addr add "$inet" dev br-phy
> > ip link set br-phy up
> > ip addr flush dev enp0s8 2>/dev/null
> > ip link set enp0s8 up
> > iptables -F
> >
> > ovs-vsctl add-br br-int \
> >           -- set Bridge br-int datapath_type=netdev \
> >           -- set bridge br-phy fail-mode=standalone
> >
> > Step 2 – Creating netns to for overlay endpoints:
> >
> > On first Node (192.168.77.101):
> > ip netns add ns0
> > ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> > ip link set veth0 netns ns0
> > ovs-vsctl add-port br-int veth1
> > ip link set dev veth1 up
> > ip netns exec ns0 ip addr add 10.10.0.1/24 dev veth0
> > ip netns exec ns0 ip link set dev veth0 up
> >
> > On second Node (192.168.77.102):
> > ip netns add ns0
> > ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> > ip link set veth0 netns ns0
> > ovs-vsctl add-port br-int veth1
> > ip link set dev veth1 up
> > ip netns exec ns0 ip addr add 10.10.0.2/24 dev veth0
> > ip netns exec ns0 ip link set dev veth0 up
> >
> > Step 3 – Create tunnel (run on each Node):
> >
> > ovs-vsctl add-port br-int tun0 -- set interface tun0 type=geneve \
> > ofport_request=100 options:remote_ip=flow options:key=flow
> >
> > Step 4 – Create the following flows:
> >
> > On first Node (192.168.77.101):
> > root@ovs-test-node-1:/home/vagrant# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int --no-stats
> > priority=100,ip actions=resubmit(,10)
> > priority=0 actions=NORMAL
> > priority=50 actions=resubmit(,40)
> > table=10, priority=100,ip actions=ct(table=20,zone=65520)
> > table=20, priority=200,ct_state=-new+trk,ip actions=resubmit(,30)
> > table=20, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.10.0.2 actions=resubmit(,30)
> > table=20, priority=0,ip actions=drop
> > table=30, priority=100,ip actions=ct(commit,table=40,zone=65520)
> > table=40, priority=100,in_port=veth1 
> > actions=load:0xc0a84d66->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],output:tun0
> > table=40, priority=100,in_port=tun0 actions=output:veth1
> > table=40, priority=0 actions=drop
> >
> > On second Node (192.168.77.102):
> > root@ovs-test-node-2:/home/vagrant# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int --no-stats
> > priority=100,ip actions=resubmit(,10)
> > priority=0 actions=NORMAL
> > priority=50 actions=resubmit(,40)
> > table=10, priority=100,ip actions=ct(table=20,zone=65520)
> > table=20, priority=200,ct_state=-new+trk,ip actions=resubmit(,30)
> > table=20, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.10.0.2 actions=resubmit(,30)
> > table=20, priority=0,ip actions=drop
> > table=30, priority=100,ip actions=ct(commit,table=40,zone=65520)
> > table=40, priority=100,in_port=veth1 
> > actions=load:0xc0a84d65->NXM_NX_TUN_IPV4_DST[],output:tun0
> > table=40, priority=100,in_port=tun0 actions=output:veth1
> > table=40, priority=0 actions=drop
> >
> > Step 5 – Check that ping works:
> > From the first Node: ip netns exec ns0 ping 10.10.0.2
> >
> > Step 6 – The actual issue:
> > From the first Node: ip netns exec ns0 ping -c 3 10.10.0.2
> > From the second Node: ovs-ofctl del-flows br-int 
> > 'table=20,ip,nw_dst=10.10.0.2'
> > From the first Node: ip netns exec ns0 ping -c 3 10.10.0.2
> >
> > Execute these instructions in order, as soon as the previous one
> > completes.  If you follow these steps, you should see the ping in
> > the last step succeed.  This is not expected because of the deleted
> > flow. It also does not happen with VXLAN.
> >
>
> Since you already know how to reproduce the issue, could you, please, create
> a system test out of these steps or more simplified ones without conntrack?
>
> A unit test would be ideal, though.
>
> I didn't review the patch itself, but the issue seems not easy to analyze
> and very easy to re-introduce someday without regression tests.
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

Thanks William and Ilya for feedback.  WIll work with Toms to add a
test, then submit the next version.

Thanks,

-Yi-Hung
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to