On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote: > There are a few tests that fail (also northd-C tests) and I suspect it's > because the OVS IDL split patches [0] this commit depends on don't > include some of the recent fixes that went into the OVS IDL code, at > least the following:
I'm not sure whether the above comment was against an older form of the idl-split patches that went into master, but to make sure I took a careful look. > - https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/97dbef6 I think that thiis is incorporated in the current OVS tree. I see the same code and comment in ovsdb-cs.c that was once in ovsdb-idl.c. > - https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/91a6a45 > - https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/08e130a > - https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/f0d23f6 The above commits appear to me to be incorporated in the OVS tree correctly. Not much (any?) change was needed. The idl-split didn't have much effect on row tracking in general, because it's solidly on the idl side of the split. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
