On 16/02/2021 15:53, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> Depending on the logical flow matches, multiple SB flows can point to
> the same desired flow.  If it happens that the desired flow conflicts
> with a more restrictive (already installed) flow, then we shouldn't try
> to add the desired flow multiple times to the list maintained for the
> installed flow.
> 
> Fixes: 6f0b1e02d9ab ("ofctrl: Incremental processing for flow installation by 
> tracking.")
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
> ---
> Note: I'm quite sure about the "Fixes" tag above, however, I couldn't
> reproduce the issue without the following commit:
>   dadae4f800cc ("ofctrl.c: Only merge actions for conjunctive flows.")
> ---
>  controller/ofctrl.c |  3 +--
>  tests/ovn.at        | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
> index 9d62e12..f2bb93a 100644
> --- a/controller/ofctrl.c
> +++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
> @@ -1975,8 +1975,7 @@ update_installed_flows_by_track(struct 
> ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
>                  /* The installed flow is installed for f, but f has change
>                   * tracked, so it must have been modified. */
>                  installed_flow_mod(&i->flow, &f->flow, msgs);
> -                ovn_flow_log(&i->flow, "updating installed (tracked)");

Why did you delete this log message?

> -            } else {> +            } else if (!f->installed_flow) {
>                  /* Adding a new flow that conflicts with an existing 
> installed
>                   * flow, so add it to the link.  If this flow becomes active,
>                   * e.g., it is less restrictive than the previous active flow
> diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
> index 55ea6d1..933958e 100644
> --- a/tests/ovn.at
> +++ b/tests/ovn.at
> @@ -13955,6 +13955,25 @@ AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int 
> table=45 | ofctl_strip_all | \
>   table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 
> actions=conjunction()
>  ])
>  
> +# Add another ACL that overlaps with the existing less restrictive ones.
> +check ovn-nbctl acl-add ls1 to-lport 3 'udp || ((ip4.src==10.0.0.1 || 
> ip4.src==10.0.0.2) && (ip4.dst == 10.0.0.3 || ip4.dst == 10.0.0.4))' allow
> +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
> +

Please add a comment here it will help explain what is expected and
follows the pattern of other tests.

> +AT_CHECK([as hv1 ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int table=45 | ofctl_strip_all | \
> +   grep "priority=1003" | \
> +   sed 's/conjunction([[^)]]*)/conjunction()/g' | sort], [0], [dnl
> + table=45, priority=1003,conj_id=2,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
> + table=45, priority=1003,conj_id=3,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
> + table=45, priority=1003,conj_id=4,ip,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
> + table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.3 
> actions=conjunction(),conjunction(),conjunction()
> + table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=10.0.0.4 
> actions=conjunction(),conjunction(),conjunction()
> + table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.1 
> actions=resubmit(,46)
> + table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.2 
> actions=conjunction(),conjunction()
> + table=45, priority=1003,ip,metadata=0x1,nw_src=10.0.0.42 
> actions=conjunction()
> + table=45, priority=1003,udp,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
> + table=45, priority=1003,udp6,metadata=0x1 actions=resubmit(,46)
> +])
> +
>  OVN_CLEANUP([hv1])
>  AT_CLEANUP
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to