On 2/23/2021 3:10 PM, Sriharsha Basavapatna wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:57 PM Eli Britstein <[email protected]> wrote:
A miss in virtual port offloads means the flow with tnl_pop was
offloaded, but not the following one. Recover the state and continue
with SW processing.
Relates to my comment on Patch-1; please explain what is meant by
recovering the packet state.
See my response there.
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gaetan Rivet <[email protected]>
---
lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
index 8cc90d0f1..21aa26b42 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
@@ -1610,6 +1610,100 @@ netdev_offload_dpdk_flow_dump_destroy(struct
netdev_flow_dump *dump)
return 0;
}
+static struct netdev *
+get_vport_netdev(const char *dpif_type,
+ struct rte_flow_tunnel *tunnel,
+ odp_port_t *odp_port)
+{
+ const struct netdev_tunnel_config *tnl_cfg;
+ struct netdev_flow_dump **netdev_dumps;
+ struct netdev *vport = NULL;
+ bool found = false;
+ int num_ports = 0;
+ int err;
+ int i;
+
+ netdev_dumps = netdev_ports_flow_dump_create(dpif_type, &num_ports, false);
This relates to my comment in Patch-3; flow_dump_create() in this
context is very confusing since we are not really dumping flows. We
might as well walk the list of ports/netdevs looking for a specific
netdev, just like other netdev_ports_*() routines in netdev-offload.c;
may be add a new function in netdev-offload.c:
As in the response there. I used an existing API, not introducing new ones.
netdev_ports_get_tunnel_vport(dpif_type, tunnel_type, tp_dst): /*
example: tunnel_type == "vxlan", tp_dst = 4789 */
HMAP_FOR_EACH (data, portno_node, &port_to_netdev) {
if (netdev_get_dpif_type(data->netdev) == dpif_type &&
netdev_get_type(data->netdev) == tunnel_type) {
tnl_cfg = netdev_get_tunnel_config(data->netdev);
if (tnl_cfg && tnl_cfg->dst_port == tp_dst) {
....
....
}
}
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ports; i++) {
+ if (!found && tunnel->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN &&
+ !strcmp(netdev_get_type(netdev_dumps[i]->netdev), "vxlan")) {
+ tnl_cfg = netdev_get_tunnel_config(netdev_dumps[i]->netdev);
+ if (tnl_cfg && tnl_cfg->dst_port == tunnel->tp_dst) {
+ found = true;
+ vport = netdev_dumps[i]->netdev;
+ netdev_ref(vport);
+ *odp_port = netdev_dumps[i]->port;
+ }
+ }
+ err = netdev_flow_dump_destroy(netdev_dumps[i]);
+ if (err != 0 && err != EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ VLOG_ERR("failed dumping netdev: %s", ovs_strerror(err));
+ }
+ }
+ return vport;
+}
+
+static int
+netdev_offload_dpdk_hw_miss_packet_recover(struct netdev *netdev,
+ struct dp_packet *packet)
+{
+ struct rte_flow_restore_info rte_restore_info;
+ struct rte_flow_tunnel *rte_tnl;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+ struct netdev *vport_netdev;
+ struct pkt_metadata *md;
+ struct flow_tnl *md_tnl;
+ odp_port_t vport_odp;
+
+ if (netdev_dpdk_rte_flow_get_restore_info(netdev, packet,
+ &rte_restore_info, &error)) {
+ /* This function is called for every packet, and in most cases there
+ * will be no restore info from the HW, thus error is expected.
Right now this API (get_restore_info) is needed only in the case of
tunnel offloads; is there some way we could avoid calling this for
every packet (e.g non-offloaded, non-tunnel-offloaded packets) ?
No other way I can think of. Suggestions?
What is expected from the PMD using the given 'packet' argument ? This
is not clear from the API description in rte_flow.h.
The PMD is expected to use any data on the packet in order to provide
the HW info.
mlx5 PMD uses mark to do it, but each PMD is free to use whatever
implementation suitable for its HW.
If the description is not clear enough, I suggest you comment/fix in
DPDK ML.
Is the PMD supposed to parse this packet and return success only if it
is an encapsulated packet ? Are there any other additional conditions
like the packet should be marked (i.e., the PMD should validate
rte_mbuf->hash.fdir fields etc) ? If it is a marked packet, does OVS
set the mark action or should the PMD implicitly add a mark action,
while offloading flow F1 ? If the PMD implicitly adds a mark action,
won't it conflict with mark-ids managed by OVS ?
Again, it is the PMD decision. In mlx5, there is a devarg to enable
tunnel offload APIs. In this mode, the PMD uses internal marks, and deny
the user to use his own MARK actions, so no conflict.
OVS partial offload doesn't work in this mode.
+ */
+ (void) error;
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ rte_tnl = &rte_restore_info.tunnel;
+ if (rte_restore_info.flags & RTE_FLOW_RESTORE_INFO_TUNNEL) {
+ vport_netdev = get_vport_netdev(netdev->dpif_type, rte_tnl,
+ &vport_odp);
+ md = &packet->md;
+ if (rte_restore_info.flags & RTE_FLOW_RESTORE_INFO_ENCAPSULATED) {
+ if (!vport_netdev || !vport_netdev->netdev_class ||
+ !vport_netdev->netdev_class->pop_header) {
+ VLOG_ERR("vport nedtdev=%s with no pop_header method",
+ netdev_get_name(vport_netdev));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ vport_netdev->netdev_class->pop_header(packet);
+ netdev_close(vport_netdev);
+ } else {
The else condition handles the case when the packet is tunneled, but
it is not encapsulated ? It is not clear how/when this could happen ?
Again, this is the PMD decision. OVS should handle.
Thanks,
-Harsha
+ md_tnl = &md->tunnel;
+ if (rte_tnl->is_ipv6) {
+ memcpy(&md_tnl->ipv6_src, &rte_tnl->ipv6.src_addr,
+ sizeof md_tnl->ipv6_src);
+ memcpy(&md_tnl->ipv6_dst, &rte_tnl->ipv6.dst_addr,
+ sizeof md_tnl->ipv6_dst);
+ } else {
+ md_tnl->ip_src = rte_tnl->ipv4.src_addr;
+ md_tnl->ip_dst = rte_tnl->ipv4.dst_addr;
+ }
+ md_tnl->tun_id = htonll(rte_tnl->tun_id);
+ md_tnl->flags = rte_tnl->tun_flags;
+ md_tnl->ip_tos = rte_tnl->tos;
+ md_tnl->ip_ttl = rte_tnl->ttl;
+ md_tnl->tp_src = rte_tnl->tp_src;
+ }
+ if (vport_netdev) {
+ md->in_port.odp_port = vport_odp;
+ }
+ }
+ dp_packet_reset_offload(packet);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
const struct netdev_flow_api netdev_offload_dpdk = {
.type = "dpdk_flow_api",
.flow_put = netdev_offload_dpdk_flow_put,
@@ -1619,4 +1713,5 @@ const struct netdev_flow_api netdev_offload_dpdk = {
.flow_flush = netdev_offload_dpdk_flow_flush,
.flow_dump_create = netdev_offload_dpdk_flow_dump_create,
.flow_dump_destroy = netdev_offload_dpdk_flow_dump_destroy,
+ .hw_miss_packet_recover = netdev_offload_dpdk_hw_miss_packet_recover,
};
--
2.28.0.546.g385c171
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
