Marcelo Leitner <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:35:04AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: >> +static int >> +probe_insert_ct_state_rule(int ifindex, uint16_t ct_state, struct tcf_id >> *id) >> +{ >> + int prio = TC_RESERVED_PRIORITY_MAX + 1; >> + struct tc_flower flower; >> + >> + memset(&flower, 0, sizeof flower); >> + flower.key.ct_state = ct_state; >> + flower.mask.ct_state = ct_state; >> + flower.tc_policy = TC_POLICY_SKIP_HW; > > This field is introduced in patch 3/3 here and with that, if doing a > bisect or so, the line above will fail to compile. It's best if patch > 3 is moved to the front of the patchset, like it is on the 2.13 > patchset.
Oops... I had moved them, but forgot to regenerate the series. I'll repost 2.14 branch. > Btw, I liked how the backports are going to be probe for the new > features but not use them. That might give useful debugging > information later on. > > Marcelo _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
