On 31/05/2021 13:20, miter wrote: > This patch fix the style of bridge_configure_rstp() function. > > Signed-off-by: linhuang <[email protected]> > --- > vswitchd/bridge.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c > index 5ed7e8234..4ada54475 100644 > --- a/vswitchd/bridge.c > +++ b/vswitchd/bridge.c > @@ -1883,14 +1883,12 @@ bridge_configure_rstp(struct bridge *br, bool > enable_rstp) > > if (eth_addr_from_string(config_str, &ea)) { > br_s.address = eth_addr_to_uint64(ea); > - } > - else { > + } else { > br_s.address = eth_addr_to_uint64(br->ea); > VLOG_ERR("bridge %s: invalid rstp-address, defaulting " > "to "ETH_ADDR_FMT, br->name, ETH_ADDR_ARGS(br->ea)); > } > - } > - else { > + } else { > br_s.address = eth_addr_to_uint64(br->ea); > } >
Hello. This v2 patch is still corrupt. Please check Ben's previous mail to other patches with similar whitespace issues. On the change itself, while you are correct about the coding standards, i'm not sure that it's worth individual fixes for these. The current code is not so bad that it's confusing and it might be better fixing things like this when there are some other related changes in the function etc. or else all of them together. Other more general arguments for not having small coding standards changes like this in isolation are that it can create more work for backporting future bugfixes, it's an additional step when using 'git blame' and most importantly it's another patch for the overworked maintainers to process. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
