On 6/14/21 5:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:17:01PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> We don't need to continue parsing if already oversized. This is not
>> very important, but fuzzer times out while parsing very long list of
>> actions.
>>
>> Reported-at: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29190
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
>
> Is {1..8190} portable shell syntax? It's not in POSIX. The "dash"
> shell doesn't understand it.
>
> I'd tend to write $(seq 8190) instead.
Good point. Thanks for spotting!
I'll fix that in v2.
>
>> +data_valid=$( printf 'set(encap()),%.0s' {1..8190})
>> +data_invalid=$(printf 'set(encap()),%.0s' {1..8191})
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
