On 6/23/21 5:52 PM, Eli Britstein wrote:
> VXLAN decap in OVS-DPDK configuration consists of two flows:
> F1: in_port(ens1f0),eth(),ipv4(),udp(), actions:tnl_pop(vxlan_sys_4789)
> F2: tunnel(),in_port(vxlan_sys_4789),eth(),ipv4(), actions:ens1f0_0
> 
> F1 is a classification flow. It has outer headers matches and it
> classifies the packet as a VXLAN packet, and using tnl_pop action the
> packet continues processing in F2.
> F2 is a flow that has matches on tunnel metadata as well as on the inner
> packet headers (as any other flow).
> 
> In order to fully offload VXLAN decap path, both F1 and F2 should be
> offloaded. As there are more than one flow in HW, it is possible that
> F1 is done by HW but F2 is not. Packet is received by SW, and should be
> processed starting from F2 as F1 was already done by HW.
> Rte_flows are applicable only on physical port IDs. Keeping the original
> physical in port on which the packet is received on enables applying
> vport flows (e.g. F2) on that physical port.
> 
> This patch-set makes use of [1] introduced in DPDK 20.11, that adds API
> for tunnel offloads.
> 
> Note that MLX5 PMD has a bug that the tnl_pop private actions must be
> first. In OVS it is not.
> Fixing this issue is scheduled for 21.05 (and stable 20.11.2).
> Meanwhile, tests were done with a workaround for it [2].
> 
> v2-v1:
> - Tracking original in_port, and applying vport on that physical port instead 
> of all PFs.
> v3-v2:
> - Traversing ports using a new API instead of flow_dump.
> - Refactor packet state recover logic, with bug fix for error pop_header.
> - One ref count for netdev in non-tunnel case.
> - Rename variables, comments, rebase.
> v4-v3:
> - Extract orig_in_port from physdev for flow modify.
> - Miss handling fixes.
> v5-v4:
> - Drop refactor offload rule creation commit.
> - Comment about setting in_port in restore.
> - Refactor vports flow offload commit.
> v6-v5:
> - Fixed duplicate netdev ref bug.
> v7-v6:
> - Adopting Ilya's diff, with a minor fix in set_error stub.
> - Fixed abort (remove OVS_NOT_REACHED()) with tunnels other than vxlan
>   ("netdev-offload-dpdk: Support tunnel pop action.").

Thanks!  I see the only difference (beside the set_error fix) with what
I have locally is following:

diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
index 363f32f71..6bd5b6c9f 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
@@ -835,7 +835,9 @@ vport_to_rte_tunnel(struct netdev *vport,
                           netdev_dpdk_get_port_id(netdev));
         }
     } else {
-        OVS_NOT_REACHED();
+        VLOG_DBG_RL(&rl, "vport type '%s' is not supported",
+                    netdev_get_type(vport));
+        return -1;
     }
 
     return 0;
---

That looks good to me.  So, I guess, Harsha, we're waiting for
your review/tests here.

> 
> Travis:
> v1: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/756418552
> v2: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/758382963
> v3: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/761089087
> v4: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/763146966
> v5: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/765271879
> v6: https://travis-ci.org/github/elibritstein/OVS/builds/765816800
> v7: Have a problem to run

Yes, this thing is non-functional.  Even travis-ci.com doesn't work
for me for unknown reason (I do have compute credits).

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to