On 7/1/21 9:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:17:04AM -0700, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:47:45PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:52:07AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this short test adds support for add port-based ingress policing based
>>>> packet-per-second rate-limiting. This builds on existing support for
>>>> byte-per-second rate limiting.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v2
>>>>
>>>> * Remove the for loop in function nl_msg_put_act_police()
>>>> * Remove unused enum definition for qos type
>>>> * Define 1 kpkts as 1000 packets rather than 1024 packets
>>>> * Update the description for the new item in ovsdb
>>>> * Fix some format warnings according robot's comments
>>>>
>>>> Changes between v1 and v2
>>>> * Correct typo: s/comsume/consume/
>>>
>>> Hi Marcelo,
>>>
>>> could I trouble you for a review of this series.
>>> I believe it addresses the issues that you raised in v2.
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Yes, it does, thanks.
>>
>> I'd like to run some tests and get more acquainted with rate limiting
>> on OVS before adding a Reviewed-by tag, but I couldn't do it so far
>> and now I'm not sure I can do it this week. Anyhow, lets not have the
>> merge blocked on this, unless you really want to. :-)
>> I probably can get to this next week, FWIW.
> 
> Thanks Marcelo,
> 
> I've gone ahead and applied this series.
> 
> Please do let us know if there are any problems you find,
> we're more than happy to discuss follow-up.

One follow up could be to add NEWS entry, as this is a user-visible change. :)

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to