> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:18:12AM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:34 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > This should avoid some work by doing the cheapest check (the one on
> > > UseLogicalDatapathGroups) before any joins.  DDlog is probably
> > > factoring out the reference to the Flow relation, which is identical
> > > in both, but this ought to avoid the group_by aggregation (which is
> > > relatively expensive) in the case where UseLogicalDatapathGroups is
> > > not enabled.
> > 
> > Thanks! I didn't know that the order matters. (not sure if there is
> > documentation that I missed)
> 
> In general, DDlog executes each rule in the order given, so if you have
> a series of joins in a rule, then it's a good idea to order them, if you
> can, to keep the number of records small at each join step.  It won't
> affect the correctness, but it will affect performance.
> 
> This might not be documented well.  I do occasionally work on the DDlog
> documentation, so I've made a note to try to see whether the effect of
> ordering is mentioned and improve it if I can.
> 
> In this particular case, I talked to Leonid about it during a discussion
> of how to improve performance and memory use in the benchmark currently
> at issue, and Leonid says that the ordering doesn't actually matter in
> this case because both of the possibilities (the ones for
> UseLogicalDatapathGroups[true] and UseLogicalDatapathGroups[false]) had
> an identical clause at the beginning.  DDlog optimizes identical
> prefixes, so there was no real difference in performance.
> 
> This patch could, therefore, be dropped, but it should also not be
> harmful.  Dropping it would require some changes to the later patch that
> updates the ovn-northd ddlog code, so folding it into that one would
> also be an option.
> 

Do you want me to repost dropping this patch or is the series fine as it is?

Regards,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to