Just using 'rem > 0' might be unsafe, so it's better
to use the nla_ok() instead.
Because we can see from the nla_next() that
'*remaining' might be smaller than 'totlen'. And nla_ok()
will avoid it happening.
For example, ovs_dp_process_packet() -> ovs_execute_actions()
-> do_execute_actions() -> output_userspace(), and attr comes
from OVS_CB(skb)->input_vport,which restores the received packet
from the user space.

Fixes: ccb1352e76cff0524e7ccb2074826a092dd13016
('net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.')
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiash...@iscas.ac.cn>
---
 net/openvswitch/actions.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
index c23537f..e8236dd 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
@@ -915,8 +915,7 @@ static int output_userspace(struct datapath *dp, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
        upcall.cmd = OVS_PACKET_CMD_ACTION;
        upcall.mru = OVS_CB(skb)->mru;
 
-       for (a = nla_data(attr), rem = nla_len(attr); rem > 0;
-            a = nla_next(a, &rem)) {
+       nla_for_each_nested(a, attr, rem) {
                switch (nla_type(a)) {
                case OVS_USERSPACE_ATTR_USERDATA:
                        upcall.userdata = a;
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to