Thanks Kevin. We'll surely discuss and consider these inputs.
Regards, Anurag -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 2:13 PM To: Anurag Agarwal <[email protected]>; Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Anju Thomas <[email protected]>; Jan Scheurich <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/4] dpif-netdev: rxq auto-lb improvements Hi Anurag, On 17/09/2021 06:50, Anurag Agarwal wrote: > Thanks Ilya for your email. Except for one patch, all the others are > superseded by the patchset posted by Kevin. > > Outstanding patch that should be applicable is the following one: > > [ovs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] dpif-netdev: Allow cross-NUMA polling on > selected ports > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=4760a095-18fb99d8-4760e00e-86b56 > 8293eb5-df0380a4cf79b012&q=1&e=1b8e101b-a85c-4478-b693-8af0a0375815&u= > https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fpipermail%2Fovs-dev%2F2021-June%2 > F384547.html > > This needs some rework to align with the patchset committed to master. > > I will get back to you on this. > Please also consider the comments related to this approach that Jan and I discussed in the other thread. i.e. if the measured history can be a good estimate in case of changing PMD NUMA during reassignment. https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=8f3f7aaf-d0a443e2-8f3f3a34-86b568293eb5-32e16f663f3e97be&q=1&e=1b8e101b-a85c-4478-b693-8af0a0375815&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fpipermail%2Fovs-dev%2F2021-July%2F385695.html > Regards, > Anurag > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:53 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: Anurag Agarwal <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Anju Thomas <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/4] dpif-netdev: rxq auto-lb > improvements > > On 6/29/21 13:27, [email protected] wrote: >> From: Anurag Agarwal <[email protected]> >> >> ========= Disclaimer ============== >> This patch set was prepared and verified downstream in early 2021. A >> very similar set of patches with auto load balance enhancements has >> recently been submitted by Red Hat: >> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0f466baf-50dd5293-0f462b34-86b1886cfa64-83b131dca3da994c&q=1&e=cfdc31f3-b150-4130-94a6-dc4488ef724a&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fpipermail%2Fovs-dev%2F2021-June%2F383618.html. >> >> >> We acknowledge the large overlap between both patch sets and submit >> our set of patches to underline the importance of these improvements >> and offer our own implementation as an alternative proposal. We are >> very much open to discussing the best way forward in the OVS-DPDK >> community to merge all improvements together in one patch set. >> ======================================= > > As the other patch set got accepted, this one is no longer applicable. > If some changes from it are still relevant, please, rebase and send a new > version. > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
