On 10/11/21 6:14 AM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 10/11/21 12:01 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
On 10/9/21 1:05 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
This is correct, thank you for fixing it.

One comment and one question:

1) While the referred patch that suppressed LOCAL_ONLY traffic exposed
the issue, it was always a bug, though affecting a tiny minority of
scenarios.

For example for PD, one can probably imagine a scenario where PD server
is not located in a provider network but is hosted on a VIF that is
attached to a "public" logical switch (no localnet ports!). This VIF may
be located on a different chassis, in which case, even without the
suppressing patch, PD requests wouldn't reach PD server. On the other
hand, they would reach the server if its VIF would happen to land on the
same chassis. A similar scenario may be envisioned for BFD, where router
ports are distributed across multiple chassis.

I agree, the "Fixes" tag looks wrong.  I think it should be:

Fixes: e3a398e9146e ("controller: Add ipv6 prefix delegation state machine")
Fixes: 365a8a696afb ("bfd: support demand mode on rx side.")

ack, do I need to repost to fix them?


I guess it's up to the maintainers; in any case if you plan to repost
then feel free to include my ack:

Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>

Regards,
Dumitru


Thanks everyone, I updated the "Fixes" tags as suggested earlier in the thread and pushed the changes to main and branch-21.09.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to