On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:19 AM Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/24/21 17:15, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 7:52 PM Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> BFD entries are updated and their ->ref field is set to 'true' when
> >> static routes are parsed, within build_lflows(), in the 'en_lflow' I-P
> >> node.  Therefore we cannot clean up BFD entries in 'en_northd' which is
> >> an input of 'en_lflow'.
> >>
> >> To fix this we now move all BFD handling in the 'en_lflow' node.
> >>
> >> This fixes the CI failures that we've recently started hitting when
> >> running the ovn-kubernetes jobs, for example:
> >> https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/runs/4294661249?check_suite_focus=true#step:10:9154
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1fa6612ffebf ("northd: Add lflow node")
> >> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Hi Dumitru,
> >
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> > Thanks for fixing this issue.
> >
>
> Thanks for reviewing this.
>
> > In my opinion en_northd engine node should handle the DB syncs and
> > en_lflow engine node
> > should handle the flow generation. I think it would be better to move
> > the syncing  of
> > NB bfd->state  from en_lflow engine node (ie frombuild_lflows())  to
> > en_northd engine node.
> > This would mean en_northd engine node should iterate the logical
> > static routes and set the
> > status. Which would mean we need to move out the function
> > parsed_routes_add() from
> > build_static_route_flows_for_lrouter().
> >
> > What do you think ? Would you agree with this ?
> >
>
> Sounds like this would be the ideal way to implement this, yes.
>
> > I'm not too sure about how easy it is ?  I'm inclined to accept this
>
> I don't see a very clean way of implementing it though.
>
> > patch and then revisit this
> > as a follow up or once we branch out of 21.12.
>
> I think this would be the safest way to go for now.

Sounds good.  I applied this patch to the main branch.

Numan

>
> >
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Numan
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Dumitru
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to