On 11/29/21 16:50, Salvatore Daniele wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:01 AM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/4/21 20:54, Salvatore Daniele wrote:
>>> Hi Ilya,
>>>
>>> Per your feedback on v4, I accounted for igmp_type/code, both in the
>>> work-around in 1/2, and removing it from match.c entirely in 2/2.
>>>
>>> I was not sure the best way to proceed regarding the issue I had
>>> mentioned on v4 where ofputil_normalize_match__() fails to recognize
>>> 'igmp/ip,nw_proto=2' as an L3 protocol and normalizes igmp flows,
>>> removing igmp_type/code.
>>>
>>> However, I feel removing the fields as you suggested should solve the
>>> problem regardless.
>>>
>>> Curious to hear your thoughts at your convenience!
>>
>> Hi.  Thanks for v5 and sorry for it taking so long for me to reply.
>>
>> Patches LGTM at the first glance.  I'll run a couple of tests with
>> them and apply if everything will look fine.
> 
> Great, thank you Ilya!

I moved the NEWS entry to the correct place and applied the series.
The first patch also backported down to 2.13.  Thanks!

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to