On 12/1/21 20:02, Paul Blakey wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> 
>> On 11/7/21 13:12, Roi Dayan via dev wrote:
>>> From: Paul Blakey <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Fragmented packets with offset=0 are defragmented by tc act_ct, and
>>> only when assembled pass to next action, in ovs offload case,
>>> a goto action. Since stats are overwritten on each action dump,
>>> only the stats for last action in the tc filter action priority
>>> list is taken, the stats on the goto action, which count
>>> only the assembled packets. See below for example.
>>>
>>> Hardware updates just part of the actions (gact, ct, mirred) - those
>>> that support stats_update() operation. Since datapath rules end
>>> with either an output (mirred) or recirc/drop (both gact), tc rule
>>> will at least have one action that supports it. For software packets,
>>> the first action will have the max software packets count.
>>> Tc dumps total packets (hw + sw) and hardware packets, then
>>> software packets needs to be calculated from this (total - hw).
>>>
>>> To fix the above, get hardware packets and calculate software packets
>>> for each action, take the max of each set, then combine back
>>> to get the total packets that went through software and hardware.
>>>
>>> Example by running ping above MTU (ping <IP> -s 2000):
>>> ct_state(-trk),recirc_id(0),...,ipv4(proto=1,frag=first),
>>>   packets:14, bytes:19544,..., actions:ct(zone=1),recirc(0x1)
>>> ct_state(-trk),recirc_id(0),...,ipv4(proto=1,frag=later),
>>>   packets:14, bytes:28392,..., actions:ct(zone=1),recirc(0x1)
>>>
>>> Second rule should have had bytes=14*<size of 'later' frag>, but instead
>>> it's bytes=14*<size of assembled packets - size of 'first' + 'later'
>>> frags>.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 576126a931cd ("netdev-offload-tc: Add conntrack support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/netdev-offload-tc.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>  lib/tc.c                | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>  lib/tc.h                |  3 ++-
>>>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-tc.c b/lib/netdev-offload-tc.c
>>> index 9845e8d3feae..3f7068c8e066 100644
>>> --- a/lib/netdev-offload-tc.c
>>> +++ b/lib/netdev-offload-tc.c
>>> @@ -585,8 +585,10 @@ parse_tc_flower_to_stats(struct tc_flower *flower,
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      memset(stats, 0, sizeof *stats);
>>> -    stats->n_packets = get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats.n_packets);
>>> -    stats->n_bytes = get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats.n_bytes);
>>> +    stats->n_packets = get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats_sw.n_packets);
>>> +    stats->n_packets += get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats_hw.n_packets);
>>> +    stats->n_bytes = get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats_sw.n_bytes);
>>> +    stats->n_bytes += get_32aligned_u64(&flower->stats_hw.n_bytes);
>>>      stats->used = flower->lastused;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -2015,9 +2017,7 @@ netdev_tc_flow_del(struct netdev *netdev OVS_UNUSED,
>>>      if (stats) {
>>>          memset(stats, 0, sizeof *stats);
>>>          if (!tc_get_flower(&id, &flower)) {
>>> -            stats->n_packets = get_32aligned_u64(&flower.stats.n_packets);
>>> -            stats->n_bytes = get_32aligned_u64(&flower.stats.n_bytes);
>>> -            stats->used = flower.lastused;
>>> +            parse_tc_flower_to_stats(&flower, stats);
>>>          }
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/lib/tc.c b/lib/tc.c
>>> index 38a1dfc0ebc8..961aef619815 100644
>>> --- a/lib/tc.c
>>> +++ b/lib/tc.c
>>> @@ -1702,6 +1702,9 @@ static const struct nl_policy stats_policy[] = {
>>>      [TCA_STATS_BASIC] = { .type = NL_A_UNSPEC,
>>>                            .min_len = sizeof(struct gnet_stats_basic),
>>>                            .optional = false, },
>>> +    [TCA_STATS_BASIC_HW] = { .type = NL_A_UNSPEC,
>>> +                             .min_len = sizeof(struct gnet_stats_basic),
>>> +                             .optional = true, },
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static int
>>> @@ -1714,8 +1717,11 @@ nl_parse_single_action(struct nlattr *action, struct 
>>> tc_flower *flower,
>>>      const char *act_kind;
>>>      struct nlattr *action_attrs[ARRAY_SIZE(act_policy)];
>>>      struct nlattr *stats_attrs[ARRAY_SIZE(stats_policy)];
>>> -    struct ovs_flow_stats *stats = &flower->stats;
>>> -    const struct gnet_stats_basic *bs;
>>> +    struct ovs_flow_stats *stats_sw = &flower->stats_sw;
>>> +    struct ovs_flow_stats *stats_hw = &flower->stats_hw;
>>> +    const struct gnet_stats_basic *bs_all = NULL;
>>> +    const struct gnet_stats_basic *bs_hw = NULL;
>>> +    struct gnet_stats_basic bs_sw = { .packets = 0, .bytes = 0, };
>>>      int err = 0;
>>>  
>>>      if (!nl_parse_nested(action, act_policy, action_attrs,
>>> @@ -1771,10 +1777,26 @@ nl_parse_single_action(struct nlattr *action, 
>>> struct tc_flower *flower,
>>>          return EPROTO;
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> -    bs = nl_attr_get_unspec(stats_attrs[TCA_STATS_BASIC], sizeof *bs);
>>> -    if (bs->packets) {
>>> -        put_32aligned_u64(&stats->n_packets, bs->packets);
>>> -        put_32aligned_u64(&stats->n_bytes, bs->bytes);
>>> +    bs_all = nl_attr_get_unspec(stats_attrs[TCA_STATS_BASIC], sizeof 
>>> *bs_all);
>>> +    if (stats_attrs[TCA_STATS_BASIC_HW]) {
>>> +        bs_hw = nl_attr_get_unspec(stats_attrs[TCA_STATS_BASIC_HW],
>>> +                                   sizeof *bs_hw);
>>> +
>>> +        bs_sw.packets = bs_all->packets - bs_hw->packets;
>>> +        bs_sw.bytes = bs_all->bytes - bs_hw->bytes;
>>
>> IIUC, there are kernels that supports some kind of TC offload, but
>> has no support for TCA_STATS_BASIC_HW.  If that right?
>> In this case, I suppose, bs_hw will be NULL here and OVS will crash.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>>
> 
>  Yes, but for such cases they will fail the check for "if 
> (stats_attrs[TCA_STATS_BASIC_HW]) {" and not access bs_hw.
> 

Hmm.  You're right.  I guess, I misread the if statement.
Sorry for the noise.

Bets regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to