> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:54 PM Ian Stokes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This commit adds support for DPDK v21.11, it includes the following > > changes. > > > > 1. ci: Install python elftools for DPDK 21.02. > > 2. ci: Update meson requirement for DPDK 21.05. > > 3. netdev-dpdk: Fix build with 21.05. > > 4. ci: Compile DPDK in non developer mode. > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=242480&state=* > > > > 5. netdev-dpdk: Remove access to DPDK internals. > > 6. netdev-dpdk: Remove unused attribute from rte_flow rule. > > 7. netdev-dpdk: Fix mbuf macros namespace with 21.11-rc1. > > 8. netdev-dpdk: Fix vhost namespace with 21.11-rc2. > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=271040&state=* > > > > For credit all authors of the original commits to 'dpdk-latest' with the > > above > > changes have been added as co-authors for this commit. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > > Co-authored-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <[email protected]> > > --- > > .ci/linux-build.sh | 6 +- > > .ci/linux-prepare.sh | 4 +- > > Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 16 ++--- > > Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst | 8 +-- > > Documentation/topics/dpdk/vdev.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/topics/testing.rst | 2 +- > > I did a quick pass and caught some small things to fix: > > - should we list 21.11.x for 2.17.x in Documentation/faq/releases.rst table?
Good point, in the past we've held off on adding this until the 2.17 branch is actually created so I left this out for the moment. > > > - there is one reference to 20.11 documentation in > Documentation/topics/userspace-tso.rst:__ > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-20.11/nics/overview.html > Good catch, will fix. > > - Fedora spec still references 20.11: > rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in:BuildRequires: dpdk-devel >= 20.11 Happy to update this, I think in the past its been carried out by the RH folks. > > > The rest is the same than dpdk-latest branch (with the experimental > api build check kept in dpdk-latest only). > So lgtm, and with those small things from above fixed, feel free to add: So the one thing I spotted was the dpdk unit tests now fail, it seems there is a new log we need to track from testpmd I'm guessing to ensure they work, will roll this change into the v1 of this patch along with the changes above. > > Reviewed-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > Thanks for the review. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
