On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:57:33 +0200 Paul Blakey wrote:
> @@ -238,10 +239,12 @@ void
> skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
> void *target_container, u16 *ctinfo_map,
> - size_t mapsize, bool post_ct)
> + size_t mapsize)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK)
> + bool post_ct = tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct;
> struct flow_dissector_key_ct *key;
> + u16 zone = tc_skb_cb(skb)->zone;
> enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
> struct nf_conn_labels *cl;
> struct nf_conn *ct;
> @@ -260,6 +263,7 @@ skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (!ct) {
> key->ct_state = TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_TRACKED |
> TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_INVALID;
> + key->ct_zone = zone;
> return;
> }
>
Why is flow dissector expecting skb cb to be TC now?
Please keep the appropriate abstractions intact.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
