Hi Kevin, > > I wonder if we could use the term 'overloaded' instead of 'above the > threshold' ? > > Don't have a strong preference tbh. > > > > I tried to avoid using 'overloaded' here because it might suggest that the CPU > is at 100% utilization processing packets, and the datapath is in some error > state where packets are dropping etc. > > For example, if the user sets the threshold for 70% and the cycles are above > it at say 80% and all working well, it might be confusing to call that > 'overloaded'. So I tried to just reference the threshold itself e.g. 'above > the > threshold'. WDYT?
Sure, makes sense :) Thanks and regards, Sunil _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
