On 7 Jan 2022, at 14:15, Ilya Maximets wrote:

> On 1/7/22 13:43, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7 Jan 2022, at 13:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eelco,
>>>
>>> On 1/5/22 10:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>>> Currently, if a flow reply results in a message which exceeds
>>>> the maximum reply size, it will assert OVS. This would happen
>>>> when OVN uses OpenFlow15 to add large flows, and they get read
>>>> using OpenFlow10 with ovs-ofctl.
>>>>
>>>> This patch prevents this and adds a test case to make sure the
>>>> code behaves as expected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2:
>>>>    - Fixed test to actually verify the output.
>>>>    - Used ofpbuf_oversized() instead of manual calculation.
>>>>
>>>>   lib/ofp-flow.c     |   11 ++++++++++-
>>>>   tests/ovs-ofctl.at |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/ofp-flow.c b/lib/ofp-flow.c
>>>> index ff0396845..97b342c03 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/ofp-flow.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/ofp-flow.c
>>>> @@ -1254,7 +1254,16 @@ ofputil_append_flow_stats_reply(const struct 
>>>> ofputil_flow_stats *fs,
>>>>           OVS_NOT_REACHED();
>>>>       }
>>>>  -    ofpmp_postappend(replies, start_ofs);
>>>> +    if (ofpbuf_oversized(reply)) {
>>>> +        /* When this happens, the reply will not fit in a single OFP 
>>>> message,
>>>> +         * and we should not append it to the queue. We will log a warning
>>>> +         * and continue with the next flow stat entry. */
>>>> +        reply->size = start_ofs;
>>>> +        VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "Flow exceeded the maximum flow statistics 
>>>> reply "
>>>> +                     "size and was excluded from the response set");
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +        ofpmp_postappend(replies, start_ofs);
>>>> +    }
>>>>       fs_->match.flow.tunnel.metadata.tab = orig_tun_table;
>>>>   }
>>>>  diff --git a/tests/ovs-ofctl.at b/tests/ovs-ofctl.at
>>>> index 586e55806..090b5f0ad 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/ovs-ofctl.at
>>>> +++ b/tests/ovs-ofctl.at
>>>> @@ -3252,3 +3252,22 @@ dnl because we need ovs-vswitchd to have the 
>>>> controller config before starting
>>>>   dnl the controller to 'snoop' the OpenFlow messages from beginning
>>>>   OVS_VSWITCHD_STOP(["/connection failed (No such file or directory)/d"])
>>>>   AT_CLEANUP
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +AT_SETUP([ovs-ofctl show-flows - Oversized flow])
>>>> +OVS_VSWITCHD_START
>>>> +
>>>> +printf " 
>>>> priority=90,icmp,reg15=0x8005,metadata=0x1,nw_dst=11.0.0.1,icmp_type=8,icmp_code=0
>>>>  actions=" > flow.txt
>>>> +for i in `seq 1 1022`; do printf 
>>>> "set_field:0x399->reg13,set_field:0x$i->reg15,resubmit(,39),"; done >> 
>>>> flow.txt
>>>> +echo "resubmit(,39)" >> flow.txt
>>>
>>> Minor comment, but maybe using printf everywhere would be more
>>> consistent.
>>
>> Thanks for the review Maxime!
>> Ilya do you want me to send another revision with this change, or are you ok 
>> (or fix it on commit)?
>
> If you mean just s/echo/printf/ in the line above, this can be fixed
> on commit, I think.
>
> But I'd prefer Maxime to review v3 of the patch. :)
>
> OTOH, I'd prefer
>
>   s/(char *) reply->msg - (char *) reply->header/ofpbuf_headersize(reply)/
>
> in the v3.  So, maybe you can change both things and post v4 to avoid
> confusion about different versions?

ACK, will send a v4

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to