Hi, Vladislav, Han, On 2/17/22 07:54, Han Zhou wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:32 AM Vladislav Odintsov <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Dumitru, >> >> I’ve got a general question about what the logical topology you’d like to > implement. >> >> Also, please see inline comments. >> >> >> Regards, >> Vladislav Odintsov >> >>> On 14 Feb 2022, at 15:51, Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Vladislav, >>> >>> I was looking at what options we have in OVN to implement a VRF-like >>> behavior and then remembered you had worked on the multiple routing >>> table feature. >>> > > Hi Dumitru, during the code review it has been clarified that this > RouteTable feature is NOT for VRF-like use cases. VRF-like use cases can be > directly implemented with multiple LRs in OVN.
Thanks both for your replies! I was initially thinking that it might be wasteful to use separate resources (LRs) for different VRFs but on second thought that's not much of an overhead. It also has the advantage that we don't need to make other resources (e.g., Load_Balancers) VRF-aware. > > Thanks, > Han > Thanks again! Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
