On 1/31/22 11:34, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> The parse_key_and_mask_to_match() is a function to translate
> a netlink formatted key/mask to match structure. And should
> not consider any configuration setting when translating.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/odp-util.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

<snip>

> @@ -7540,7 +7554,8 @@ parse_key_and_mask_to_match(const struct nlattr *key, 
> size_t key_len,
>  {
>      enum odp_key_fitness fitness;
>  
> -    fitness = odp_flow_key_to_flow(key, key_len, &match->flow, NULL);
> +    fitness = odp_flow_key_to_flow__(key, key_len, &match->flow, 
> &match->flow,
> +                                     NULL, true);
>      if (fitness) {
>          /* This should not happen: it indicates that
>           * odp_flow_key_from_flow() and odp_flow_key_to_flow() disagree on
> @@ -7561,8 +7576,8 @@ parse_key_and_mask_to_match(const struct nlattr *key, 
> size_t key_len,
>          return EINVAL;
>      }
>  
> -    fitness = odp_flow_key_to_mask(mask, mask_len, &match->wc, &match->flow,
> -                                   NULL);
> +    fitness = odp_flow_key_to_mask__(mask, mask_len, &match->wc, 
> &match->flow,
> +                                     NULL, false);

Should there be 'true'?  Doesn't seem right to ignore the limit for keys, but
not for a mask.

>      if (fitness) {
>          /* This should not happen: it indicates that
>           * odp_flow_key_from_mask() and odp_flow_key_to_mask()
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to