On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:55:07AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:27:08PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:55:27PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:34:24AM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
> > > > After cited commit optimizted hw insertion, flow table entries are
> > > > populated with ifindex information which was intended to only be used
> > > > for HW offload. This tuple ifindex is hashed in the flow table key, so
> > > > it must be filled for lookup to be successful. But tuple ifindex is only
> > > > relevant for the netfilter flowtables (nft), so it's not filled in
> > > > act_ct flow table lookup, resulting in lookup failure, and no SW
> > > > offload and no offload teardown for TCP connection FIN/RST packets.
> > > >
> > > > To fix this, allow flow tables that don't hash the ifindex.
> > > > Netfilter flow tables will keep using ifindex for a more specific
> > > > offload, while act_ct will not.
> > >
> > > Using iif == zero should be enough to specify not set?
> >
> > You mean, when searching, if search input iif == zero, to simply not
> > check it? That seems dangerous somehow.
>
> dev_new_index() does not allocate ifindex as zero.
>
> Anyway, @Paul: could you add a tc_ifidx field instead in the union
> right after __hash instead to fix 9795ded7f924?
I mean this incomplete patch below:
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h
b/include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h
index a3647fadf1cc..d4fa4f716f68 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ struct flow_offload_tuple {
u8 h_source[ETH_ALEN];
u8 h_dest[ETH_ALEN];
} out;
+ u32 tc_ifidx;
};
};
You will need to update nf_flow_rule_match() to set key->meta.ingress_ifindex to
use tc_ifidx if it is set to non-zero value.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
