On 3/14/22 12:29, Phelan, Michael wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday 11 March 2022 20:38
>> To: ovs-dev <[email protected]>; Phelan, Michael
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Ferriter, Cian
>> <[email protected]>; Aaron Conole <[email protected]>;
>> Kalahasthi, Suneetha <[email protected]>; Amber, Kumar
>> <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-build] |fail| pw1600225 [ovs-dev, branch-2.15] dpdk: Use
>> DPDK 20.11.4 release
>>
>>> Test-Label: intel-ovs-compilation
>>> Test-Status:  fail
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/1600225/
>>>
>>> AVX-512_compilation: failed
>>> DPLCS Test: fail
>>> DPIF Test: fail
>>> MFEX Test: fail
>>> Errors in DPCLS test:
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00034|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 15,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00035|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 15
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00036|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 19,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00037|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 19
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00038|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 21,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00039|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 21
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00040|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 25,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00041|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 25
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00042|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 27,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00043|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 27
>>>> Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00044|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation for avx512_ipv4_udp failed in pkt 31,
>> disabling.
>>>> 2022-03-02T16:05:44.579Z|00045|dpif_netdev_extract(pmd-
>> c21/id:101)|ERR|Autovalidation failure details:
>>>> MFEX autovalidator pkt 31
>>
>> Hey, Michael, others.
>>
>> Above errors are not part of the current OVS code, nor the patch this report
>> is for.  But I see that code in the other patch that has no test report from 
>> the
>> intel-ovs-compilation:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220225115654.5
>> [email protected]/
>>
>> Seems like report was sent to a wrong patch.  The patch number at the top of
>> the mail is correct though, so I'm not sure what is going on.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 
> Hi Ilya,
> The patch was tagged with branch-2.15 so the CI tested the patch with OVS 
> 2.15 and DPDK 20.11 so perhaps that is why the unusual errors occurred?

There is no code that could print such messages on any upstream
branch.  So, I see only two options:

- Report sent to a wrong patch
or
- The patch for testing was applied to non-upstream version of OVS.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see other option on how
the 'Good hash: 121684652 len: 72       Test hash:0 len:0' can be
printed with upstream OVS + DPDK 20.11.4 patch.

> 
> Amber's patch was tested and results reported to the build mailing list, 
> however the result was not picked up by patchwork as it was sent before I had 
> corrected how failures were reported. 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Michael.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to