On 4/26/22 03:10, Han Zhou wrote: >>> Is this something that we should consider adding at some point to the >>> Python IDL code as well? I know in the past feature support has >>> diverged. Maybe at some point we should create a python/TODO file that >>> lists features in the C IDL that still need to be implemented if they >>> aren't immediately added with C IDL changes? >> You're right, we should [robably consider adding this as a new mode to >> the Python IDL too. I can do that as a follow up if needed. However, >> until now, the only user of this new mode is ovn-northd and it will be >> using it in conjunction with change tracking (which is another missing >> Python IDL feature). >> >> Han, Ilya, what do you think? >> >> Nevertheless, a TODO list would probably be good to have indeed. >> > I agree that a TODO would be good for the python IDL. Since there are > already feature gaps, I think it may be a separate patch to add TODOs for > all the gaps. > > Thanks, > Han >
OK, thanks for the feedback! I'll work on a patch to add a python/TODO.rst file and send it out after the C IDL change is accepted. Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
