On 5/10/22 18:16, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>>> Hi Ilya,
>>>
>>> Please find my replies inline.
>>
>> Hi all, this patch seems to have hit a wall, I can see there is a v6 that 
>> came after
>> this that has been acked:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220329101724.3148
>> [email protected]/
>>
>> I would like to see this work go in, but think we should finish the 
>> discussion on
>> this tread before proceeding. My thoughts below on the discussion.
> 
> HI All,
> 
> Just a ping on this thread, there doesn't seem to be any response since last 
> week, the technical issues seem to have been resolved in the Acked- v6 . 
> Unless there are any further discussion I was going to merge this tomorrow?

Hi.  Sorry, got sidetracked by other issues.

I thought we reached the conclusion on this patch during the patch
review meeting a few weeks ago.  We were discussing it with Cian,
not sure if you were there.  And the conclusion was to not have this
patch as it is a duplication of the same info that can be acquired
in a different way.

However, when I had a chance to run a few tests for hashing patches,
I noticed that it is indeed a gap in a user experience.  So, I guess,
it's OK to have this change.  At the same time, I think, if we're
going to accept this change, the subtable-lookup-prio-get command has
to be re-named, because the name will no longer match with the data
this command shows.

For the dp-extra-info, I'm not sure if we need that patch if we're
going to accept the counters.  The reason is the same - duplicated
functionality.  Once introduced, it's hard to get rid of duplicates.
E.g. we still need to do something with pmd-stats-show and
pmd-perf-show.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to