On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 16:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:58 PM David Ahern <dsah...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
> > > short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or
> > > maybe netdev_hold_notrack().
> > 
> > I like that option. Similar to the old nla_parse functions that were
> > renamed with _deprecated - makes it easier to catch new uses.
> 
> I think we need to clearly document the needed conversions for future
> bugfix backports.
> 

To be on the same page: do you think we need something under
Documentation with this patch? or with the later dev_hold rename? or
did I misunderstood completely?

Thanks!

Paolo

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to