On 7/19/22 11:14, Stokes, Ian wrote: >> On 7/15/22 20:33, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 7/15/22 20:24, Stokes, Ian wrote: >>>>> Looks like new MTU tests are unstable. >>>>> Ian, Michael, could you, please, check? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets. >>>> >>>> Hey Ilya, >>>> >>>> Let me take a look at this, it passed our internal CI so not sure why it's >> failed externally, worst case I can revert this as it was really just a nice >> to >> have, if it's holding up the branching would you prefer this? >>> >>> No, it's not holding up branching. Just wanted to highlight the >>> issue. Would be great to fix it in a near future, but it's not >>> critical for right now. Thanks. >> >> I think, the tests are lacking the 'Clean up the testpmd now' part >> at least. If testpmd is still running while we're tearing down OVS, >> there is a fair chance that some packets will be received while the >> OpenFlow port is already removed. That migth explain some of the >> failures. Not sure if that what happened in this particular case >> thouhg. >> >> Also, looksing at other failure reports I see some weird things like: >> >> Unreasonably long 1140ms poll interval (408ms user, 263ms system) >> >> 408 + 263 != 1140. The main thread got preempted for half a second >> in this case. Are you running something else on the same cores on >> that system? Or maybe some processes are not getting stopped properly >> after the test? > > Thanks Ilya, I'll look at the unit tests today (apologies for the delay, few > folks were out of office yesterday). > With regards the system, Michael will be back in office tomorrow and I can > ask him to check the system then to see if there are any processes acting > incorrectly?
Sure. Thanks for the update. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
