On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:15:38PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 8/16/22 14:50, Simon Horman wrote: > > Chaoyong He says: > > > > This PR is the updates rte_flow phases 1 and 2 for OVS-DPDK: > > > > * Support offload of set IPv4/IPv6 DSCP action > > * Support offload of IPv6 tunnel > > * Add flow_api support for netdev geneve vports > > * Support offload of the decap action of geneve tunnel > > > > Chaoyong He (5): > > netdev-offload-dpdk: Support offload of set IPv4 DSCP action > > netdev-offload-dpdk: Support offload of set IPv6 DSCP action > > netdev-offload-dpdk: Add support of IPv6 tunnel > > netdev-dpdk: Add flow_api support for netdev geneve vports > > netdev-offload-dpdk: Add support of geneve decap action > > > > lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 3 +- > > lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Hi. Is it the same patch set as was sent yesterday by Chaoyong He: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=313846 > ? Or there are some changes?
Chaoyong He can confirm, but, yes, I believe they are the same. What has happened, AFAIK, is that we didn't believe that Chaoyong He's posting went through and he ask me to post the patches. Clearly I should have checked patchwork before doing so. And I apologise for the noise. > Regarding geneve support, there is already a patch set from Eli here: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=284870&state=* > > It's in a kind of deferred state, there was a short discussion whether > it make sense to have geneve support without options. If you have > opinion on that, replies to that discussion are welcome. Thanks, we'll follow-up on that _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
