On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:57 PM Wentao Jia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Numan
>
> Thanks for you reply.
>
> The network topology as follows:
>
>      vm1 -----> logical switch 1
> (192.168.200.165)           \
>                            -----------> router ---------> extenel-net
>                           /
>      vm2 -----> logical switch 2
> (192.168.210.102)
>
> Nat rules of the rotuer:
> TYPE                EXTERNAL_IP            LOGICAL_IP
> dnat_and_snat         1.1.1.166             192.168.210.102
> snat                  1.1.1.124             192.168.200.0/24
> snat                  1.1.1.124             192.168.210.0/24
>
> there is only lr_out_snat logical flows for snat rules, no lr_out_undnat 
> logical flow.
>   table=3 (lr_out_snat        ), priority=153  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.200.0/24 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_snat_in_czone(1.1.1.124);)
>   table=3 (lr_out_snat        ), priority=153  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.210.0/24 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_snat_in_czone(1.1.1.124);)
>
> but there are lr_out_snat and lr_out_undnat logical flows for dnat_and_snat 
> rule
>   table=1 (lr_out_undnat      ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.210.102 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_dnat_in_czone;)
>   table=3 (lr_out_snat        ), priority=161  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.210.102 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_snat_in_czone(1.1.1.166);)
>
> and there are lr_in_dnat and lr_in_unsnat logical flows for dnat_and_snat 
> rule too
>   table=4 (lr_in_unsnat       ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.dst == 
> 1.1.1.166 && inport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> flags.loopback == 0 && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_snat_in_czone;)
>   table=4 (lr_in_unsnat       ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.dst == 
> 1.1.1.166 && inport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> flags.loopback == 1 && flags.use_snat_zone == 1 && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_snat;)
>   table=6 (lr_in_dnat         ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.dst == 
> 1.1.1.166 && inport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_dnat_in_czone(192.168.210.102);)
>
> after patched, another lr_out_undnat logical flow for snat rule and another 
> lr_in_unsnat logical flow for dnat rule, lr_out_undnat logical flows as 
> follows:
>   table=1 (lr_out_undnat      ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.200.0/24 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_dnat_in_czone;)
>   table=1 (lr_out_undnat      ), priority=100  , match=(ip && ip4.src == 
> 192.168.210.0/24 && outport == "lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406" && 
> is_chassis_resident("cr-lrp-0e701852-85a0-4c57-8014-77a8607a9406")), 
> action=(ct_dnat_in_czone;)


Can you share the ovn-nbctl commands to reproduce this ?  or even
better if you can share your OVN Northbound database so that I can
locally try ?

Thanks
Numan

>
> B R
> Wentao Jia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Numan Siddique <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 12:11 PM
> To: Ales Musil <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wentao Jia <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [OVN PATCH] northd: add unsnat/undnat lflow for 
> established connections
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 9:46 PM Ales Musil <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:05 PM Wentao Jia <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > snat/dnat rules of logical router, no logical flows for established
> > > connection, all natted packets deliver to kernel conntrack module by
> > > ct commit, this is low performance and difficult to offload.
> > > add another logical flows without ct commit forestablished on
> > > pipeline stage of unsnat/undnat for logical router
> > >
> > > before patched, datapath flows for nat with ct commit
> > > ufid:db1fbd1b-8f16-4681-81b0-3796d60332a8,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),packet_t
> > > ype(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=fa:16:3e:a1:50:79,dst=fa:16:3e:39:69:0a),
> > > eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=
> > > 192.168.200.128/255.255.255.192,dst=1.1.1.254,proto=6,tos=0/0,ttl=64
> > > ,frag=no),tcp(src=0/0,dst=0/0), packets:2969075, bytes:4071176800,
> > > used:0.000s, dp:tc,
> > > actions:set(eth(src=fa:16:3e:ae:b5:e5,dst=8c:1f:64:30:61:43)),set(ip
> > > v4(ttl=63)),ct(commit,zone=22,nat(src=1.1.1.124)),recirc(0x14b)
> > > ufid:e9c5df95-02df-4629-b399-ddeb5581e997,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0x14b),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),pack
> > > et_type(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=fa:16:3e:ae:b5:e5,dst=8c:1f:64:30:61:
> > > 43),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=
> > > 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,dst=1.1.1.240/255.255.255.240,proto=0/0,tos=0/0,ttl=
> > > 0/0,frag=no), packets:2969075, bytes:4071176800, used:0.001s,
> > > offloaded:yes, dp:tc,
> > > actions:ct_clear,enp1s0np1
> > >
> > > after patched, there is two flows for nat, the flow with ct commit
> > > will be timeout and deleted after connection established. another
> > > flow without ct commit for established connection
> > > ufid:f6a591d6-de32-49cc-bf03-7a00a7601ad0,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),packet_t
> > > ype(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=fa:16:3e:a1:50:79,dst=fa:16:3e:39:69:0a),
> > > eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.200.165,dst=1.1.1.254,proto=6,tos=
> > > 0/0,ttl=64,frag=no),tcp(src=0/0,dst=0/0),
> > > packets:5518542, bytes:7924612730, used:0.040s, offloaded:yes,
> > > dp:tc,
> > > actions:set(eth(src=fa:16:3e:ae:b5:e5,dst=8c:1f:64:30:61:43)),set(ip
> > > v4(ttl=63)),ct(zone=22,nat),recirc(0x14d)
> > > ufid:6af5a3ed-5920-4f5b-923e-7e2cb5fc3d6c,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0x14d),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),pack
> > > et_type(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00,d
> > > st=00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00:00),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=19
> > > 2.168.200.165,dst=
> > > 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,proto=0/0,tos=0/0,ttl=0/0,frag=no), packets:1,
> > > bytes:60, used:6.530s, dp:tc,
> > > actions:ct(commit,zone=22,nat(src=1.1.1.166)),recirc(0x14e)
> > > ufid:b3505ba7-9367-4533-a5df-f1f897376c54,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0x14d),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),pack
> > > et_type(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=fa:16:3e:ae:b5:e5,dst=8c:1f:64:30:61:
> > > 43),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=
> > > 0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0,dst=1.1.1.240/255.255.255.240,proto=0/0,tos=0/0,tt
> > > l=0/0,frag=no), packets:5518539, bytes:7924612529, used:0.040s,
> > > offloaded:yes, dp:tc,
> > > actions:ct_clear,enp1s0np1
> > > ufid:ac4c188c-5320-4376-a53e-b1561e5ca209,
> > > skb_priority(0/0),skb_mark(0/0),ct_state(0/0),ct_zone(0/0),ct_mark(0
> > > /0),ct_label(0/0),recirc_id(0x14e),dp_hash(0/0),in_port(rep0_0),pack
> > > et_type(ns=0/0,id=0/0),eth(src=fa:16:3e:ae:b5:e5,dst=8c:1f:64:30:61:
> > > 43),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=
> > > 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,dst=1.1.1.240/255.255.255.240,proto=0/0,tos=0/0,ttl=
> > > 0/0,frag=no), packets:1, bytes:60, used:6.531s, offloaded:yes,
> > > dp:tc,
> > > actions:ct_clear,enp1s0np1
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wentao Jia <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > northd/northd.c | 10 +++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c index
> > > d31cb1688..1e7406a72 100644
> > > --- a/northd/northd.c
> > > +++ b/northd/northd.c
> > > @@ -12867,11 +12867,8 @@ build_lrouter_in_unsnat_flow(struct hmap
> > > *lflows, struct ovn_datapath *od,
> > >      * Undoing SNAT has to happen before DNAT processing.  This is
> > >      * because when the packet was DNATed in ingress pipeline, it did
> > >      * not know about the possibility of eventual additional SNAT in
> > > -    * egress pipeline. */
> > > -    if (strcmp(nat->type, "snat") && strcmp(nat->type, "dnat_and_snat")) 
> > > {
> > > -        return;
> > > -    }
> > > -
> > > +    * egress pipeline.
> > > +    */
> > >      bool stateless = lrouter_nat_is_stateless(nat);
> > >      if (od->is_gw_router) {
> > >          ds_clear(match);
> > > @@ -13036,8 +13033,7 @@ build_lrouter_out_undnat_flow(struct hmap
> > > *lflows, struct ovn_datapath *od,
> > >      *
> > >      * Note that this only applies for NAT on a distributed router.
> > >      */
> > > -    if (!od->n_l3dgw_ports ||
> > > -        (strcmp(nat->type, "dnat") && strcmp(nat->type,
> > > "dnat_and_snat"))) {
> > > +    if (!od->n_l3dgw_ports) {
> > >          return;
> > >      }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dev mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> > >
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you for the patch. I am afraid that in current form the patch is
> > not right. The changes presented here are adding additional undnat for
> > snat and vice versa. I am not entirely sure how this helps with
> > established connections. Could you please elaborate more on what are
> > you trying to achieve?
>
>
> Hi Wentao Jia,
>
> I see your reply to Ales in the patchworks here - 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/bn6pr13mb1202629b22d0676432213f29ed...@bn6pr13mb1202.namprd13.prod.outlook.com/
>
> But it's weird that I don't see it in my mail.
>
> I am really confused with this patch.
>
> Can you please add a test case for this ? And also share the scenario with 
> ovn-nbctl commands so that we can test it out locally ?
>
> Thanks
> Numan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ales
> >
> > --
> >
> > Ales Musil
> >
> > Senior Software Engineer - OVN Core
> >
> > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>
> >
> > [email protected]    IM: amusil
> > <https://red.ht/sig>
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to