On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 2:25 AM Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:46 AM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > northd doesn't process changes incrementally, so it makes sense to
> > accumulate more database updates and process them in bulk, so we can
> > cover everything in a single recompute.
> >
> > ovsdb-server has a mechanism to start accumulating changes if the
> > client doesn't receive them fast enough, but it relies on the receive
> > buffer size, which is a few hundreds of KB on a typical system.
> > Unfortunately, that is enough to queue up several hundreds of small
> > updates, and it takes northd a lot of time to process them if poll
> > intervals are large, receiving at most 50 messages on each iteration
> > (half of which are updates for a _Server database).
> >
> > Calling ovsdb_idl_run() as long as something changes.  This allows to
> > quickly process large bursts of database updates.  For example, it
> > takes only 30-40 seconds for 'ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync' to finish on
> > a 500-node cluster after the startup phase of the density-heavy
> > ovn-heater test, instead of 6-8 minutes without this change.
> >
> > 500 ms seems like a reasonable hard limit to avoid spinning for too
> > long if the database is changed constantly at a fast pace.
> >
> > Very long polling is also logged at INFO level to notify users.
> > Not using WARN or higher because it may happen under normal conditions,
> > e.g. on the initial connection to a large database or another type
> > of a single large update.  Other notable polling attempts are logged
> > at debug level.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  northd/ovn-northd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/northd/ovn-northd.c b/northd/ovn-northd.c
> > index bd35802ed..96f17f15f 100644
> > --- a/northd/ovn-northd.c
> > +++ b/northd/ovn-northd.c
> > @@ -685,6 +685,36 @@ get_probe_interval(const char *db, const struct
> nbrec_nb_global *nb)
> >      return interval;
> >  }
> >
> > +static struct ovsdb_idl_txn *
> > +run_idl_loop(struct ovsdb_idl_loop *idl_loop, const char *name)
> > +{
> > +    unsigned long long duration, start = time_msec();
> > +    unsigned int seqno = UINT_MAX;
> > +    struct ovsdb_idl_txn *txn;
> > +    int n = 0;
> > +
> > +    /* Accumulate database changes as long as there are some,
> > +     * but no longer than half a second. */
> > +    while (seqno != ovsdb_idl_get_seqno(idl_loop->idl)
> > +           && time_msec() - start < 500) {
> > +        seqno = ovsdb_idl_get_seqno(idl_loop->idl);
> > +        ovsdb_idl_run(idl_loop->idl);
> > +        n++;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    txn = ovsdb_idl_loop_run(idl_loop);
> > +
> > +    duration = time_msec() - start;
> > +    /* ovsdb_idl_run() is called at least 2 times.  Once directly and
> > +     * once in the ovsdb_idl_loop_run().  n > 2 means that we received
> > +     * data on at least 2 subsequent calls. */
> > +    if (n > 2 || duration > 100) {
> > +        VLOG(duration > 500 ? VLL_INFO : VLL_DBG,
> > +             "%s IDL run: %d iterations in %lld ms", name, n + 1,
> duration);
> > +    }
> > +    return txn;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int
> >  main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  {
> > @@ -821,8 +851,8 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >                  ovsdb_idl_set_lock(ovnsb_idl_loop.idl, "ovn_northd");
> >              }
> >
> > -            struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnnb_txn =
> > -                        ovsdb_idl_loop_run(&ovnnb_idl_loop);
> > +            struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnnb_txn =
> run_idl_loop(&ovnnb_idl_loop,
> > +
> "OVN_Northbound");
> >              unsigned int new_ovnnb_cond_seqno =
> >
>  ovsdb_idl_get_condition_seqno(ovnnb_idl_loop.idl);
> >              if (new_ovnnb_cond_seqno != ovnnb_cond_seqno) {
> > @@ -833,8 +863,8 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >                  ovnnb_cond_seqno = new_ovnnb_cond_seqno;
> >              }
> >
> > -            struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_txn =
> > -                        ovsdb_idl_loop_run(&ovnsb_idl_loop);
> > +            struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_txn =
> run_idl_loop(&ovnsb_idl_loop,
> > +
> "OVN_Southbound");
> >              unsigned int new_ovnsb_cond_seqno =
> >
>  ovsdb_idl_get_condition_seqno(ovnsb_idl_loop.idl);
> >              if (new_ovnsb_cond_seqno != ovnsb_cond_seqno) {
> > --
> > 2.34.3
> >
>
> Thanks Ilya for the great improvement! Applied to main.
> It is not a bug fix but it seems a good candidate for backporting to 22.09
> given that the change is small and we haven't released yet. @Mark Michelson
> <[email protected]> @Numan Siddique <[email protected]> what do you think?

+1 from me.

Thanks
Numan

>
> Han
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to