> -----Original Message----- > From: Stokes, Ian <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday 3 October 2022 18:12 > To: Phelan, Michael <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [branch-2.17, v2] dpdk: Use DPDK 21.11.2 release. > > > Update OVS CLI and relevant documentation to use DPDK 21.11.2. > > > > DPDK 21.11.2 contains fixes for the CVEs listed below: > > CVE-2022-28199 [1] > > CVE-2022-2132 [2] > > > > A bug was introduced in DPDK 21.11.1 by the commit 01e3dee29c02 > > ("vhost: fix unsafe vring addresses modifications"). > > This bug can cause a deadlock when vIOMMU is enabled and NUMA > > reallocation of the virtqueues happen. > > A fix [3] has been posted and pushed to the DPDK 21.11 branch. > > If a user wishes to avoid the issue then it is recommended to use DPDK > > 21.11.0 until the release of DPDK 21.11.3. > > It should be noted that DPDK 21.11.0 does not benefit from the > > numerous bug and CVE fixes addressed since its release. > > If a user wishes to benefit from these fixes it is recommended to use > > DPDK 21.11.2. > > > > [1] https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-28199 > > [2] https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-2132 > > [3] > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220725203206.427083-2- > > [email protected]/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan <[email protected]> > > Hi Michael, seeing MFEX errors on this patch in the Intel CI, specifically > compilation, can you check if this is s till the case?
Hey Ian, The tests were run with the wrong config on the Intel CI which caused the failures. I've reran and all tests passed without issue. Thanks, Michael. > > Thanks > Ian > > > > --- > > v2: > > - Update recommended DPDK version for older OvS versions in > Documentation. > > > > --- > > --- > > .ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +- > > Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 10 +++++----- > > Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst | 8 ++++---- > > NEWS | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/.ci/linux-build.sh b/.ci/linux-build.sh index > > 2dabd3d0a..392c7ee79 100755 > > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh > > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh > > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ fi > > > > if [ "$DPDK" ] || [ "$DPDK_SHARED" ]; then > > if [ -z "$DPDK_VER" ]; then > > - DPDK_VER="21.11.1" > > + DPDK_VER="21.11.2" > > fi > > install_dpdk $DPDK_VER > > fi > > diff --git a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > > b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst index 33a0d5d2d..49895c595 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > > @@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ Q: What DPDK version does each Open vSwitch > > release work with? > > 2.10.x 17.11.10 > > 2.11.x 18.11.9 > > 2.12.x 18.11.9 > > - 2.13.x 19.11.10 > > - 2.14.x 19.11.10 > > - 2.15.x 20.11.4 > > - 2.16.x 20.11.4 > > - 2.17.x 21.11.1 > > + 2.13.x 19.11.13 > > + 2.14.x 19.11.13 > > + 2.15.x 20.11.6 > > + 2.16.x 20.11.6 > > + 2.17.x 21.11.2 > > ============ ======== > > > > Q: Are all the DPDK releases that OVS versions work with maintained? > > diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > index f8f01bfad..a284e6851 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst > > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Build requirements > > In addition to the requirements described in :doc:`general`, building > > Open vSwitch with DPDK will require the following: > > > > -- DPDK 21.11.1 > > +- DPDK 21.11.2 > > > > - A `DPDK supported NIC`_ > > > > @@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ Install DPDK > > #. Download the `DPDK sources`_, extract the file and set ``DPDK_DIR``:: > > > > $ cd /usr/src/ > > - $ wget https://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-21.11.1.tar.xz > > - $ tar xf dpdk-21.11.1.tar.xz > > - $ export DPDK_DIR=/usr/src/dpdk-stable-21.11 > > + $ wget https://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-21.11.2.tar.xz > > + $ tar xf dpdk-21.11.2.tar.xz > > + $ export DPDK_DIR=/usr/src/dpdk-stable-21.11.2 > > $ cd $DPDK_DIR > > > > #. Configure and install DPDK using Meson diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > > index 7c71284f9..36fcbb874 100644 > > --- a/NEWS > > +++ b/NEWS > > @@ -5,6 +5,24 @@ v2.17.3 - xx xxx xxxx > > configuration in a clustered databse independently for each server. > > E.g. for listening on unique addresses. See the > > ovsdb.local-config.5 > > manpage for schema details. > > + - DPDK: > > + * OVS validated with DPDK 21.11.2. > > + DPDK 21.11.2 contains fixes for the following CVEs: > > + CVE-2022-28199 > > + cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022- > > 28199 > > + CVE-2022-2132 cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022- > 2132 > > + A bug was introduced in DPDK 21.11.1 by the commit > > + 01e3dee29c02 ("vhost: fix unsafe vring addresses modifications"). > > + This bug can cause a deadlock when vIOMMU is enabled and NUMA > > + reallocation of the virtqueues happen. > > + A fix has been posted and pushed to the DPDK 21.11 branch. > > + It can be found here: > > + > > + https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220725203206.427083- > 2- > > [email protected]/. > > + If a user wishes to avoid the issue then it is recommended to use > > + DPDK 21.11.0 until the release of DPDK 21.11.3. > > + It should be noted that DPDK 21.11.0 does not benefit from the > numerous > > + bug and CVE fixes addressed since its release. > > + If a user wishes to benefit from these fixes it is recommended to > > use > > + DPDK 21.11.2. > > > > v2.17.2 - 15 Jun 2022 > > --------------------- > > -- > > 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
