On 11/9/22 07:36, Ales Musil wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 7:29 AM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/8/22 13:11, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: >>> Introduce load-balancer affinity timeout in order to dnat connections >> received >>> from the same client to a given load-balancer to the same backend if >> received >>> in the affinity timeslot specified by the CMS. >>> >>> Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127959 >> >> Thanks for the series Lorenzo. Looks good to me, I acked all the patches. >> >> Mark, Ales, do you want to have another look or shall I go ahead and >> merge the series? >> > > I went through the last iteration and didn't spot anything so +1 from me. > >
After some more testing it seems we'll be needing a v8. There's still a bug when combining LB affinity timeout LR.options:lb_force_snat_ip. So, let's not merge this series yet. Thanks, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
