On 16/11/2022 16:20, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16 Nov 2022, at 14:32, Roi Dayan wrote:
> 
>> On 15/11/2022 14:32, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>> The tc conntrack implementation does not support the timeout option.
>>> The current implementation is silently ignoring the timeout option
>>> by adding a general conntrack entry.
>>>
>>> This patch will skip the related test by overriding the support macro.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
>>> Acked-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/system-offloads.at |    1 -
>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/system-offloads.at b/tests/system-offloads.at
>>> index c8d1fd183..a9bfda164 100644
>>> --- a/tests/system-offloads.at
>>> +++ b/tests/system-offloads.at
>>> @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ conntrack - IPv4 fragmentation with fragments specified
>>>  conntrack - IPv6 fragmentation + cvlan
>>>  conntrack - Fragmentation over vxlan
>>>  conntrack - IPv6 Fragmentation over vxlan
>>> -conntrack - zone-based timeout policy
>>>  conntrack - multiple zones, local
>>>  conntrack - multi-stage pipeline, local
>>>  conntrack - ICMP related with NAT
>>>
>>
>> the commit is missing the override macro for offloads
>> in system-offloads.at
>>
>>
>> +# Conntrack timeout not supported for tc.
>> +m4_define([CHECK_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT],
>> +[
>> +     AT_SKIP_IF([:])
>> +])
>> +
> 
> Whoops, I messed up merging this to the new file :( Odd that the test where 
> not failing, guess because I was only doing single runs :(
> 
> Let me know once you are done with the series and do a long run over the 
> weekend.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Eelco
> 

Hi,

I'm done with this. we didn't notice new or suspected failures.

Thanks,
Roi
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to