On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 5:17 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/22/22 10:29, Ales Musil wrote:
> > The related traffic wasn't correctly forwarded
> > through the LB, the main issue was that the
> > traffic was not NATted. This series allows
> > the NAT to be applied and the traffic should
> > arrive with correct addresses.
> > ---
>
> I pushed this version to the main branch.
>
> However, it's still not 100% clear to me if there are other upgrade
> related issues we should address on top of it.
>
> Frode, does this change, which introduces and uses a new action
> unconditionally in ovn-northd, affect upgrade scenarios in your deployments?
>
> Upgrading ovn-controllers first and then central components should work
> fine.
>
> Upgrading in any order with ovn-match-northd-version set on all chassis
> should also not disrupt existing flows.
>
> As a final fail safe we could also backport the feature flag bits that
> Ales added in v5 [0].  But I'd prefer not doing that if not really needed.
>
> Looking forward to your feedback!

Thank you for reaching out to me on this topic, Dumitru!

I don't see any immediate issues with this, and agree that it is
better to avoid the feature flag when not needed.

-- 
Frode Nordahl

> Thanks,
> Dumitru
>
> [0]
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to