Hi, Simon,
I see that! Thank you for review!
Best regards!
wangchuanlei
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:46:01AM -0500, wangchuanlei wrote:
> Hi, Jakub,
>
> Thank you for review, the comments below is a little confusing, can
> you give a explanation?
>
> Best regards!
> wangchuanlei
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 04:15:59 -0500 wangchuanlei wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ovs_vport_get_upcall_stats - retrieve upcall stats
> > + *
> > + * @vport: vport from which to retrieve the stats
> > + * @ovs_vport_upcall_stats: location to store stats
>
> s/ovs_vport_upcall_//
I believe Jakub is asking for "ovs_vport_upcall_" to be removed.
Or, in other words, to refer to the parameter as "stats", (which matches the
name in the function signature below).
>
> > + *
> > + * Retrieves upcall stats for the given device.
> > + *
> > + * Must be called with ovs_mutex or rcu_read_lock.
> > + */
> > +void ovs_vport_get_upcall_stats(struct vport *vport, struct
> > +ovs_vport_upcall_stats *stats)
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
