David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> writes: > dpdk-testpmd does not need hugetlbfs backing as we don't require > multiprocess support in OVS unit tests. > Plus, there is no need for explicitly reserving more memory than what > testpmd would actually need at runtime. > > Switch to --in-memory, use dynamic allocations and remove the then > unneeded check on hugetlbfs presence. > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > ---
IIRC, the requirements for hugetlbfs were linked to the version of DPDK we were using. We very likely should have addressed this when we upgraded DPDK version. Acked-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
