On 9/2/2023 21:42, Eelco Chaudron wrote:


On 9 Feb 2023, at 11:58, Simon Horman wrote:

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 05:32:40PM +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
old_meter needs to be free after it is detached regardless of whether
the new meter is successfully attached.

Fixes: c7c4c44c9a95 ("net: openvswitch: expand the meters supported number")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
---

v2: use goto label and free old_meter outside of ovs lock.

  net/openvswitch/meter.c | 12 +++++++++---
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/meter.c b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
index 6e38f68f88c2..9b680f0894f1 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/meter.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
@@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
genl_info *info)
        int err;
        u32 meter_id;
        bool failed;
+       bool locked = true;

        if (!a[OVS_METER_ATTR_ID])
                return -EINVAL;
@@ -448,11 +449,13 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
genl_info *info)
                goto exit_unlock;

        err = attach_meter(meter_tbl, meter);
-       if (err)
-               goto exit_unlock;

        ovs_unlock();

+       if (err) {
+               locked = false;
+               goto exit_free_old_meter;
+       }
        /* Build response with the meter_id and stats from
         * the old meter, if any.
         */
@@ -472,8 +475,11 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
genl_info *info)
        genlmsg_end(reply, ovs_reply_header);
        return genlmsg_reply(reply, info);

+exit_free_old_meter:
+       ovs_meter_free(old_meter);
  exit_unlock:
-       ovs_unlock();
+       if (locked)
+               ovs_unlock();

I see where you are going here, but is the complexity of the
locked variable worth the benefit of freeing old_meter outside
the lock?

Looking at the error path, I would agree with Simon, and just add an 
“exit_free_old_meter” label as suggested in v1 and keep the lock in place to 
make the error path more straightforward.

//Eelco

I see. I will send a v3 later.

Thanks,
Hangyu


        nlmsg_free(reply);
  exit_free_meter:
        kfree(meter);
--
2.34.1

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to