On 3/1/23 20:17, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Hi Ilya, I have a small suggestion below.
> 
> On 2/27/23 15:03, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> For non-dynamic address, current version performs 1 strcmp + 4 attempts
>> for ovs_scan.  Updated code perfroms 1 strncmp + 1 ovs_scan.
>>
>> Also, for ports with both IPv4 and IPv6 specified, new version doesn't
>> re-parse IPv4 twice.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   lib/ovn-util.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ovn-util.c b/lib/ovn-util.c
>> index 47484ef01..e683abb45 100644
>> --- a/lib/ovn-util.c
>> +++ b/lib/ovn-util.c
>> @@ -105,18 +105,41 @@ is_dynamic_lsp_address(const char *address)
>>       char ipv6_s[IPV6_SCAN_LEN + 1];
>>       struct eth_addr ea;
>>       ovs_be32 ip;
>> -    int n;
>> -    return (!strcmp(address, "dynamic")
>> -            || (ovs_scan(address, "dynamic "IP_SCAN_FMT"%n",
>> -                         IP_SCAN_ARGS(&ip), &n)
>> -                         && address[n] == '\0')
>> -            || (ovs_scan(address, "dynamic "IP_SCAN_FMT" "IPV6_SCAN_FMT"%n",
>> -                         IP_SCAN_ARGS(&ip), ipv6_s, &n)
>> -                         && address[n] == '\0')
>> -            || (ovs_scan(address, "dynamic "IPV6_SCAN_FMT"%n",
>> -                         ipv6_s, &n) && address[n] == '\0')
>> -            || (ovs_scan(address, ETH_ADDR_SCAN_FMT" dynamic%n",
>> -                         ETH_ADDR_SCAN_ARGS(ea), &n) && address[n] == 
>> '\0'));
>> +    int n = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (!strncmp(address, "dynamic", 7)) {
>> +        n = 7;
>> +        if (!address[n]) {
>> +            /* "dynamic" */
>> +            return true;
>> +        }
> 
> marker (see below)
> 
>> +        if (ovs_scan_len(address, &n, " "IP_SCAN_FMT, IP_SCAN_ARGS(&ip))) {
>> +            if (!address[n]) {
>> +                /* "dynamic x.x.x.x" */
>> +                return true;
>> +            }
>> +            if (ovs_scan_len(address, &n, " "IPV6_SCAN_FMT, ipv6_s)
>> +                && !address[n]) {
>> +                /* "dynamic x.x.x.x xxxx::xxxx" */
>> +                return true;
>> +            }
>> +            return false;

I guess, 6 lines above can be just removed without any logic change, right?
I mean, we'll fall-through to the exactly same 6 lines below, except for
the comment.

>> +        }
>> +        if (ovs_scan_len(address, &n, " "IPV6_SCAN_FMT, ipv6_s)
>> +            && !address[n]) {
>> +            /* "dynamic xxxx::xxxx" */
>> +            return true;
>> +        }
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
> 
> 
> I think duplication can be reduced from the above marker to here:

see above.

> 
> const char *addr = address;
> if (ovs_scan_len(addr, &n, " "IP_SCAN_FMT, IP_SCAN_ARGS(&ip))) {
>     if (!addr[n]) {
>         /* "dynamic x.x.x.x" */
>         return true;
>     }
>     addr += n;

We would also need to reset 'n' here.

> }
> if (ovs_scan_len(addr, &n, " "IPV6_SCAN_FMT, ipv6_s) && !address[n]) {
>     /* Either "dynamic xxxx::xxxx" or "dynamic x.x.x.x xxxx::xxxx"
>     return true;
> }
> return false;
> 
>> +
>> +    if (ovs_scan_len(address, &n, ETH_ADDR_SCAN_FMT" dynamic",
>> +                     ETH_ADDR_SCAN_ARGS(ea)) && !address[n]) {
>> +        /* "xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx dynamic" */
>> +        return true;
>> +    } > +
>> +    return false;
>>   }
>>     static bool
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to