On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:32:04PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Open vSwitch generally tries to let the underlying operating system
> > managed the low level details of hardware, for example DMA mapping,
> > bus arbitration, etc.  However, when using DPDK, the underlying
> > operating system yields control of many of these details to userspace
> > for management.
> >
> > In the case of some DPDK port drivers, configuring rte_flow or even
> > allocating resources may require access to iopl/ioperm calls, which
> > are guarded by the CAP_SYS_RAWIO privilege on linux systems.  These
> > calls are dangerous, and can allow a process to completely compromise
> > a system.  However, they are needed in the case of some userspace
> > driver code which manages the hardware (for example, the mlx
> > implementation of backend support for rte_flow).
> >
> > Here, we create an opt-in flag passed to the command line to allow
> > this access.  We need to do this before ever accessing the database,
> > because we want to drop all privileges asap, and cannot wait for
> > a connection to the database to be established and functional before
> > dropping.  There may be distribution specific ways to do capability
> > management as well (using for example, systemd), but they are not
> > as universal to the vswitchd as a flag.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  NEWS                           |  4 ++++
> >  lib/daemon-unix.c              | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  lib/daemon-windows.c           |  3 ++-
> >  lib/daemon.c                   |  2 +-
> >  lib/daemon.h                   |  4 ++--
> >  ovsdb/ovsdb-client.c           |  6 +++---
> >  ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c           |  4 ++--
> >  tests/test-netflow.c           |  2 +-
> >  tests/test-sflow.c             |  2 +-
> >  tests/test-unixctl.c           |  2 +-
> >  utilities/ovs-ofctl.c          |  4 ++--
> >  utilities/ovs-testcontroller.c |  4 ++--
> >  vswitchd/ovs-vswitchd.8.in     |  8 ++++++++
> >  vswitchd/ovs-vswitchd.c        | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  14 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> > index 85b3496214..65f35dcdd5 100644
> > --- a/NEWS
> > +++ b/NEWS
> > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ Post-v3.1.0
> >         in order to create OVSDB sockets with access mode of 0770.
> >     - QoS:
> >       * Added new configuration option 'jitter' for a linux-netem QoS type.
> > +   - DPDK:
> > +     * ovs-vswitchd will keep the CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability when started
> > +       with the --hw-rawio-access command line option.  This allows the
> > +       process extra privileges when mapping physical interconnect memory.
> >
> >
> >  v3.1.0 - 16 Feb 2023
> > diff --git a/lib/daemon-unix.c b/lib/daemon-unix.c
> > index 1a7ba427d7..a080facddc 100644
> > --- a/lib/daemon-unix.c
> > +++ b/lib/daemon-unix.c
> > @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ static bool switch_user = false;
> >  static uid_t uid;
> >  static gid_t gid;
> >  static char *user = NULL;
> > -static void daemon_become_new_user__(bool access_datapath);
> > +static void daemon_become_new_user__(bool access_datapath,
> > +                                     bool access_hardware_ports);
> >
> >  static void check_already_running(void);
> >  static int lock_pidfile(FILE *, int command);
> > @@ -443,13 +444,13 @@ monitor_daemon(pid_t daemon_pid)
> >   * daemonize_complete()) or that it failed to start up (by exiting with a
> >   * nonzero exit code). */
> >  void
> > -daemonize_start(bool access_datapath)
> > +daemonize_start(bool access_datapath, bool access_hardware_ports)
> >  {
> >      assert_single_threaded();
> >      daemonize_fd = -1;
> >
> >      if (switch_user) {
> > -        daemon_become_new_user__(access_datapath);
> > +        daemon_become_new_user__(access_datapath, access_hardware_ports);
> >          switch_user = false;
> >      }
> >
> > @@ -807,7 +808,8 @@ daemon_become_new_user_unix(void)
> >  /* Linux specific implementation of daemon_become_new_user()
> >   * using libcap-ng.   */
> >  static void
> > -daemon_become_new_user_linux(bool access_datapath OVS_UNUSED)
> > +daemon_become_new_user_linux(bool access_datapath OVS_UNUSED,
> > +                             bool access_hardware_ports OVS_UNUSED)
> >  {
> >  #if defined __linux__ &&  HAVE_LIBCAPNG
> >      int ret;
> > @@ -827,6 +829,16 @@ daemon_become_new_user_linux(bool access_datapath 
> > OVS_UNUSED)
> >                  ret = capng_update(CAPNG_ADD, cap_sets, CAP_NET_ADMIN)
> >                        || capng_update(CAPNG_ADD, cap_sets, CAP_NET_RAW)
> >                        || capng_update(CAPNG_ADD, cap_sets, 
> > CAP_NET_BROADCAST);
> > +#ifdef DPDK_NETDEV
> > +                if (access_hardware_ports && !ret) {
> > +                    ret = capng_update(CAPNG_ADD, cap_sets, CAP_SYS_RAWIO);
> > +                    VLOG_INFO("CAP_SYS_RAWIO enabled.");

Perhaps "The Linux capability CAP_SYS_RAWIO is enabled."

> > +                }
> > +#else
> > +                if (access_hardware_ports) {
> > +                    VLOG_WARN("Dropped CAP_SYS_RAWIO request (no 
> > drivers).");
> 
> Does it mean we drop the capability? or do we drop the drop?
> I don't really have a better wording but the current log had me
> reading it a few times.

Same here. Perhaps:
"No driver requires Linux capability CAP_SYS_RAWIO, disabling it."

my $0.02
fbl

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to