On 4/6/23 14:45, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 02:07:00PM +0200, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> On 4/5/23 14:43, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:01:26PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>>>> Similar to qos_max_rate and qos_burst, take into account qos_min_rate in
>>>> port_has_qos_params routine.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: dbf12e5fe1f7 ("qos: add support for port minimum bandwidth
>>>> guarantee")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>>> I am unsure if it is related to this change, or perhaps a transient error,
>>> but the ovn-kubernetes workflow run failed when run against this patch.
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/48d88894b808e03bbcc513b8793bc92d85eea657.1680642050.git.lorenzo.bianc...@redhat.com/
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I missed your message here and already applied the patch. I'm
>> quite confident it's unrelated though.
>
> No problem. I also feel it is likely to be unrelated.
>
>>> FWIIW, I am experimenting with re-running the workflow here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/horms/ovn/actions/runs/4618557664
>>>
>>
>> Let's see how the ovn-org/ovn jobs fare too:
>>
>> https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/actions/workflows/ovn-kubernetes.yml
>
> Yes, good idea.
>
This actually uncovered a regression in ovn-kubernetes. :)
Please ignore the failures on branches <= 22.09. I'll post an ovn-k8s
PR to fix that soon.
In the meantime, the conformance tests passed on 22.12 and 23.03. I
think we're good.
Regards,
Dumitru
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
