Make it more clear that ovn-monitor-all option has effect on OVN Southbound
database rather than local OVS.

Reported-at: 
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2023-May/052421.html
Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladislav Odintsov <odiv...@gmail.com>
---
 controller/ovn-controller.8.xml | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml b/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml
index ab52e2d34..7c0855603 100644
--- a/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml
+++ b/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml
@@ -121,11 +121,11 @@
           that is needed in the current chassis.
         </p>
         <p>
-          It is more optimal to set it to <code>true</code> in use cases when
-          the chassis would anyway need to monitor most of the records in
-          <var>ovs-database</var>, which would save the overhead of conditions
-          processing, especially for server side.  Typically, set it to
-          <code>true</code> for environments that all workloads need to be
+          It is more efficient to set it to <code>true</code> in use cases
+          where the chassis would anyway need to monitor most of the records in
+          <var>OVN Southbound</var> database, which would save the overhead of
+          conditions processing, especially for server side.  Typically, set it
+          to <code>true</code> for environments that all workloads need to be
           reachable from each other.
         </p>
         <p>
-- 
2.36.1

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to